IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04213134.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Legitimacy of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Controversy Over the Deployment of the Nutri-Score in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Morgane Fialon

    (Université Sorbonne Paris Nord)

  • Lydiane Nabec

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Chantal Julia

    (Université Sorbonne Paris Nord)

Abstract

Background: Front-of-pack nutrition labels (FoPLs) aim at increasing transparency and consumers' awareness of the nutritional composition of pre-packed food products in order to improve the nutritional quality of their food choices. Nevertheless, the legitimacy of the Nutri-Score - the FoPL officially adopted in France and several other European countries - is subject to both technical and political controversy, particularly in Italy. In this study, we investigated how and by whom the legitimacy of the Nutri-Score, recognized by several institutional authorities, could be deconstructed within a specific system of norms, values and beliefs among Italian stakeholders. Methods: A netnography completed with qualitative interviews with eight Italian and French nutrition and public health experts were carried out to highlight the dimensions (pragmatic, normative and cognitive) in which the Nutri-Score's legitimacy is being challenged among the stakeholders involved in FoPLs' implementation in Italy. The degree of influence and the position of these stakeholders on the debate around the Nutri-Score were assessed through the Stakeholder Theory (SHT), using their respective level of power, legitimacy and urgency. Furthermore, we compared the Italian and the French contexts on the issue. Results: The direct implication of political parties and media outlets in framing the Italian debate around Nutri-Score as well as the high influence of corporate unions, led to a different political outcome than in France. Results also show that the deconstruction of the legitimacy of the Nutri-Score in Italy pertained mainly to its pragmatic dimension according to the Italian public health experts. Nevertheless, its two other dimensions (normative and cognitive) are also questioned by high-influence stakeholders. Conclusion: Due to the limited mobilization of scientific expertise over the issue, the debate in Italy stayed centered around the "attack" of the Nutri-Score to the Italian way of life, mixing up concepts such as Made in Italy products and the Mediterranean diet.

Suggested Citation

  • Morgane Fialon & Lydiane Nabec & Chantal Julia, 2022. "Legitimacy of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Controversy Over the Deployment of the Nutri-Score in Italy," Post-Print hal-04213134, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04213134
    DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6127
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04213134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04213134/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lydiane Nabec & Corinne Chevalier & Eric Briat & Dominique Roux, 2015. "Légitimité et stratégies de légitimation des associations de consommateurs dans le paysage consumériste actuel," Post-Print hal-02022189, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morgane Fialon & Mauro Serafini & Pilar Galan & Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot & Mathilde Touvier & Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy & Barthélémy Sarda & Serge Hercberg & Lydiane Nabec & Chantal Julia, 2022. "Nutri-Score and NutrInform Battery: Effects on Performance and Preference in Italian Consumers," Post-Print hal-04213397, HAL.
    2. Robertson, Deirdre A. & Andersson, Ylva & Lunn, Peter D., 2023. "How consumer and provider responses to nutritional labelling interact: An online shopping experiment with implications for policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Front-of-Pack Nutri-Score Stakeholder Theory Italy Legitimacy; Front-of-Pack; Nutri-Score; Stakeholder Theory; Italy; Legitimacy;
      All these keywords.

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04213134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.