IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00403662.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk aggregation in Solvency II: How to converge the approaches of the internal models and those of the standard formula?

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent Devineau

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon, R&D, Milliman, Paris - Milliman France)

  • Stéphane Loisel

    (SAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Two approaches may be considered in order to determine the Solvency II economic capital: the use of a standard formula or the use of an internal model (global or partial). However, the results produced by these two methods are rarely similar, since the underlying hypothesis of marginal capital aggregation is not verified by the projection models used by companies. We demonstrate that the standard formula can be considered as a first order approximation of the result of the internal model. We therefore propose an alternative method of aggregation that enables to satisfactorily capture the diversity among the various risks that are considered, and to converge the internal models and the standard formula.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent Devineau & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Risk aggregation in Solvency II: How to converge the approaches of the internal models and those of the standard formula?," Post-Print hal-00403662, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00403662
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00403662v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00403662v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosenberg, Joshua V. & Schuermann, Til, 2006. "A general approach to integrated risk management with skewed, fat-tailed risks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 569-614, March.
    2. Biard, Romain & Lefèvre, Claude & Loisel, Stéphane, 2008. "Impact of correlation crises in risk theory: Asymptotics of finite-time ruin probabilities for heavy-tailed claim amounts when some independence and stationarity assumptions are relaxed," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-421, December.
    3. Wayne Fisher & Stéphane Loisel & Shaun Wang, 2008. "On some key research issues in Enterprise Risk Management related to economic capital and diversification effect at group level," Post-Print hal-00268841, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julien Vedani & Fabien Ramaharobandro, 2013. "Continuous compliance: a proxy-based monitoring framework," Papers 1309.7222, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2013.
    2. Marcel T. P. Van Dijk & Cornelis S. L. De Graaf & Cornelis W. Oosterlee, 2018. "Between ℙ and ℚ: The ℙ ℚ Measure for Pricing in Asset Liability Management," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Paulusch, Joachim & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2022. "Sensitivity-implied tail-correlation matrices," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Loisel, Stéphane & Milhaud, Xavier, 2011. "From deterministic to stochastic surrender risk models: Impact of correlation crises on economic capital," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 348-357, October.
    5. Matthieu Chauvigny & Laurent Devineau & Stéphane Loisel & Véronique Maume-Deschamps, 2011. "Fast remote but not extreme quantiles with multiple factors. Applications to Solvency II and Enterprise Risk Management," Post-Print hal-00517766, HAL.
    6. Fabrice Borel-Mathurin & Julien Vedani, 2019. "Market-consistent valuation: a step towards calculation stability," Working Papers hal-02282378, HAL.
    7. Julien Vedani & Laurent Devineau, 2012. "Solvency assessment within the ORSA framework: issues and quantitative methodologies," Papers 1210.6000, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2012.
    8. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K. Hassani, 2019. "Risk Measurement," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02119256, HAL.
    9. Mezőfi, Balázs & Niedermayer, Andras & Niedermayer, Daniel & Süli, Balázs Márton, 2017. "Solvency II reporting: How to interpret funds’ aggregate solvency capital requirement figures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 164-171.
    10. Julien Vedani & Laurent Devineau, 2012. "Solvency assessment within the ORSA framework: issues and quantitative methodologies," Working Papers hal-00744351, HAL.
    11. Pauline Milaure Ngugnie Diffouo & Pierre Devolder, 2020. "Longevity Risk Measurement of Life Annuity Products," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Asier Garayeta & J. Inaki De La Pena & Ivan Iturricastillo, 2014. "Pragmatic Solutions for Solvency Capital Requirements at Life Insurance Companies: The Case of Spain," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(4), pages 39-51, July.
    13. Arbenz, Philipp & Hummel, Christoph & Mainik, Georg, 2012. "Copula based hierarchical risk aggregation through sample reordering," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 122-133.
    14. Eling, Martin & Jung, Kwangmin, 2020. "Risk aggregation in non-life insurance: Standard models vs. internal models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 183-198.
    15. Julien Vedani & Fabien Ramaharobandro, 2013. "Continuous compliance: a proxy-based monitoring framework," Working Papers hal-00866531, HAL.
    16. Xavier Milhaud & Victorien Poncelet & Clement Saillard, 2018. "Operational Choices for Risk Aggregation in Insurance: PSDization and SCR Sensitivity," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcel Wollschlager & Rudi Schafer, 2015. "Impact of non-stationarity on estimating and modeling empirical copulas of daily stock returns," Papers 1506.08054, arXiv.org.
    2. Helmut Elsinger & Alfred Lehar & Martin Summer, 2006. "Risk Assessment for Banking Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1301-1314, September.
    3. Breuer, Thomas & Jandacka, Martin & Rheinberger, Klaus & Summer, Martin, 2010. "Does adding up of economic capital for market- and credit risk amount to conservative risk assessment?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 703-712, April.
    4. Jianping Li & Lu Wei & Cheng-Few Lee & Xiaoqian Zhu & Dengsheng Wu, 2018. "Financial statements based bank risk aggregation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 673-694, April.
    5. Shim Jeungbo & Lee Seung-Hwan, 2017. "Dependency between Risks and the Insurer’s Economic Capital: A Copula-based GARCH Model," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Paola Palmitesta & Corrado Provasi, 2005. "Aggregation of Dependent Risks Using the Koehler–Symanowski Copula Function," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 189-205, February.
    7. Yu, Lining & Voit, Eberhard O., 2006. "Construction of bivariate S-distributions with copulas," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 1822-1839, December.
    8. Loisel, Stéphane & Mazza, Christian & Rullière, Didier, 2009. "Convergence and asymptotic variance of bootstrapped finite-time ruin probabilities with partly shifted risk processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 374-381, December.
    9. Mark Carey & René M. Stulz, 2007. "The Risks of Financial Institutions," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number care06-1, July.
    10. Florin Avram & Romain Biard & Christophe Dutang & Stéphane Loisel & Landy Rabehasaina, 2014. "A survey of some recent results on Risk Theory," Post-Print hal-01616178, HAL.
    11. repec:onb:oenbwp:y::i:150:b:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Hanene MEJDOUB & Mounira BEN ARAB, 2017. "A Multivariate Analysis for Risk Capital Estimation in Insurance Industry: Vine Copulas," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(2), pages 100-119, June.
    13. Andersen, Torben G. & Bollerslev, Tim & Christoffersen, Peter F. & Diebold, Francis X., 2013. "Financial Risk Measurement for Financial Risk Management," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1127-1220, Elsevier.
    14. Penikas, Henry & Simakova, Varvara, 2009. "Interest Rate Risk Management Based on Copula-GARCH Models," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 13(1), pages 3-36.
    15. Kristine Watson Hankins, 2011. "How Do Financial Firms Manage Risk? Unraveling the Interaction of Financial and Operational Hedging," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2197-2212, December.
    16. Aigner, Philipp & Schlütter, Sebastian, 2023. "Enhancing gradient capital allocation with orthogonal convexity scenarios," ICIR Working Paper Series 47/23, Goethe University Frankfurt, International Center for Insurance Regulation (ICIR).
    17. Jeffrey E. Stambaugh & John Martinez & G. T. Lumpkin & Niyati Kataria, 0. "How well do EO measures and entrepreneurial behavior match?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    18. Bhatti, M. Ishaq & Nguyen, Cuong C., 2012. "Diversification evidence from international equity markets using extreme values and stochastic copulas," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 622-646.
    19. Hulusi Inanoglu & Michael Jacobs, 2009. "Models for Risk Aggregation and Sensitivity Analysis: An Application to Bank Economic Capital," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-72, December.
    20. Claude Lefèvre & Stéphane Loisel, 2009. "Finite-Time Ruin Probabilities for Discrete, Possibly Dependent, Claim Severities," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 425-441, September.
    21. Hussain, Saiful Izzuan & Li, Steven, 2018. "The dependence structure between Chinese and other major stock markets using extreme values and copulas," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 421-437.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00403662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.