IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/dublec/97-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does EMU Make Sense for Europe?

Author

Listed:
  • Barry, F.

Abstract

There is virtually unanimous agreement that trade integration within the European Union is to everyone's advantage. No such unanimity exists however over the net benefits, or the distribution of benefits, likely to flow from monetary union. Intense debate continues, both at the theoretical and at the empirical level, over the issue of a single currency for Europe. Advocates of EMU who focus on the political rather than the economic aspects argue that too much political capital has been invested in EMU already for the project to be postponed or abandoned. Those of the opposite persuasion focus on the tensions that will inevitably arise in the operation of the single curency; these tensions, they suggest, will use up political energy that could otherwise be devoted to the expansion of the EU, the benefits of which are not in doubt. The present paper reviews this debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Barry, F., 1997. "Does EMU Make Sense for Europe?," Papers 97/25, College Dublin, Department of Political Economy-.
  • Handle: RePEc:fth:dublec:97/25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EUROPEAN MONETARY SYSTEM;

    JEL classification:

    • F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fth:dublec:97/25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.