Many of Boettke's criticisms of formalist economics are justified. However, he defines it so broadly that it becomes practically synonymous with mainstream economics. Yet he blames it for the specific sins of formalist economics more narrowly defined. And since he treats Austrian economics as the only viable alternative to mainstream economics he incorrectly awards victory to Austrian economics. It has some valuable ideas to contribute to mainstream economics, but is not a good replacement for it, since it has serious deficiencies.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by California Davis - Department of Economics in its series Department of Economics with number
97-31.
Length: Date of creation: Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:fth:caldec:97-31
Contact details of provider: Postal: University of California Davis - Department of Economics. One Shields Ave., California 95616-8578 Phone: (530) 752-0741 Fax: (530) 752-9382 Email: Web page: http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).