This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

A Comparison of Complementary Automatic Modeling Methods: RETINA and PcGets

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Teodosio Perez-Amaral () (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Economía Cuantitativa)
Giampiero M. Gallo () (Università degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica "G. Parenti")
Halbert L. White () (University of California, San Diego, Department of Economics)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In Perez-Amaral, Gallo, and White (2003), the authors proposed an automatic predictive modelling tool called Relevant Transformation of the Inputs Network Approach (RETINA). It is designed to embody flexibility (using nonlinear transformations of the predictors of interest), selective search within the range of possible models, control of collinearity, out-of-sample forecasting ability, and computational simplicity. In this paper we compare the characteristics of RETINA with PcGets, a well-known automatic modeling method proposed by David Hendry. We point out similarities, differences, and complementarities of the two methods. In an example using US telecommunications demand data we find that RETINA can improve both in- and out-of-sample over the usual linear regression model, and over some models suggested by PcGets. Thus, both methods are useful components of the modern applied econometrician’s automated modelling tool chest.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ds.unifi.it/ricerca/pubblicazioni/working_papers/2004/wp2004_12.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica "G. Parenti" in its series Econometrics Working Papers Archive with number wp2004_12.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 21 pages
Date of creation: 04 Oct 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:fir:econom:wp2004_12

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Viale G.B. Morgagni, 59 - I-50134 Firenze - Italy
Phone: +39 055 4237211
Fax: +39 055 4223560
Web page: http://www.ds.unifi.it/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Margherita Velucchi).

Related research
Keywords: Model selection; cross-validation; flexible modelling; information criteria; forecasting.;

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Marcin Blazejowski & Pawel Kufel & Tadeusz Kufel, . "Automatic Procedure of Building Congruent Dynamic Model in Gretl," EHUCHAPS, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística). [Downloadable!]
  2. Peter C.B. Phillips, 2004. "Automated Discovery in Econometrics," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1469, Cowles Foundation, Yale University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You may want to explore EconPapers, which displays the same data as IDEAS in a different way.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-3.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.