This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Economics Against Democracy

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Manuel Couret Branco () (Department of Economics, University of Évora)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

I believe that freedom of choice constitutes a pillar of rational choice in economic theory, regardless of the definition of rational choice one adopts. On the other hand, economics being socially embedded, free choice in economics seems senseless without political freedom of choice. Democracy, therefore, plays an important role in economic efficiency as much as in social fairness. Following this line of thought one should expect that economics, both in theory and in practice, should permanently strengthen the role of democracy in its institutional construction. Unfortunately it does not seem to be the case. Although historically many of the democratic achievements in the past two centuries have been intimately connected to the development of liberal economics, one can assert that mainstream liberal economics is intrinsically contradictory with the democratic ideal. The first stage of the demonstration of this thesis concerns the dismounting of the naturalization process that economics has undergone with the purpose of transforming economic decisions into plain technical issues supposedly free from democratic debate.The second stage concerns the ways in which the market has managed to legitimise its hegemony in society and the reasons why this contributes to the erosion of democracy. Within this hegemony five aspects will be dealt with; the imposition of a market jurisdiction; the deregulation of the economy; the process of political and economic unaccountability; the de-politicization of free choice and the conflict between the territorialization of democracy and the de-territorialization of economics.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.decon.uevora.pt/working_papers.php?id=232
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal) in its series Economics Working Papers with number 03_2007.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 23 pages
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:evo:wpecon:03_2007

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7000 - 803�VORA
Phone: + 351 266 74 08 94
Fax: + 351 266 74 24 94
Email:
Web page: http://www.decon.uevora.pt
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (José Manuel Madeira Belbute).

Related research
Keywords: Democracy; Market; Politics; Liberal Economics; Participation;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare and Poverty
J8 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards
K0 - Law and Economics - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Apart from a small start up grant in the 1990's, RePEc has received no funding and lives on the help of volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-27.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.