This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Economics Against Human Rights

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Manuel Couret Branco () (Department of Economics, University of Évora)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

It is said that economics value individual and economic freedom and from that many hastily conclude that mainstream economics value human rights. The purpose of this paper is to show that on the contrary mainstream economics is fundamentally contradictory with many human rights especially Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The main reason for this is that mainstream economics and human rights have trouble in communicating, the latter speaking the rights language and the former the needs language. Within the needs language, capability to pay is the key question whereas within the rights language, entitlement is. If in the first case exclusion and inequality are acceptable in the second case the only acceptable situation is the one characterized by inclusion and equality. In other words goods and services can be unequally distributed, rights cannot. For this reason one cannot count on the market alone to ensure economic, social and cultural rights. Therefore, considering the introduction of different logics into the economic equation as unbearable interferences with economic logic, mainstream economics stands against human rights. In order to give a better illustration of this contradiction the particular conflicts between economics and the right to work, the right to water and the right to social security will be presented. The main conclusion of this paper is that in order to favour human rights economics should either suffer a paradigmatic revolution or accept to play just a supporting role in the process of global development.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.decon.uevora.pt/working_papers.php?id=231
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal) in its series Economics Working Papers with number 02_2007.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 18 pages
Date of creation: 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:evo:wpecon:02_2007

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7000 - 803�VORA
Phone: + 351 266 74 08 94
Fax: + 351 266 74 24 94
Email:
Web page: http://www.decon.uevora.pt
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (José Manuel Madeira Belbute).

Related research
Keywords: Human Rights; Economic Theory; Social Utility; Rights-Approach; Right to Work; Social Security;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
A1 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics
B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare and Poverty
J8 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards
K0 - Law and Economics - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 archives contribute their bibliographic data to RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-27.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.