This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

From Bound Duties to Actual Protection: Industrial Liberalisation in the Doha Round

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mohamed Hedi Bchir (Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII))
Lionel Fontagné () (Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII))
Sébastien Jean (OECD, Paris)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In the background of the Doha Round of trade negotiations, this study proposes a CGE assessment of multilateral liberalisation of market access for non-agricultural products. The scenarios considered include the so-called ‘Girard proposal’ (with alternative choices for the coefficient involved), the removal of tariff peaks and complete liberalisation. This study is the first to take into account the difference between bound and applied tariffs, while considering all the enforced preferential trade arrangements and computing tariff cuts at the detailed product level (HS-6 classification). Although the liberalisation of market access for non-agricultural products is found to be welfare-enhancing at the world level, cross-country distributive effects prove significant. A soft liberalisation would not significantly reduce applied duties in developing countries, owing to their considerable binding overhang. By contrast, a deep liberalisation would entail fierce price competition among those developing countries that are largely specialised in similar sectors and in the same product quality range.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.enepri.org/Publications/WP041.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (CEPS)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes in its series Economics Working Papers with number 041.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 51 pages
Date of creation: Nov 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:epr:enepwp:041

Contact details of provider:
Postal: ENEPRI c/o CEPS Place du Congrès 1 1000 Brussels Belgium
Phone: +32 2 229 3911
Fax: +32 2 219 4151
Web page: http://www.enepri.org

Order Information:
Postal: ENEPRI c/o CEPS Place du Congrès 1 1000 Brussels Belgium
Email:
Web: http://www.enepri.org

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (CEPS) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask CEPS to update the entry or send us the correct address..

Related research
Keywords: Doha development agenda; applied tariffs; preferential trade agreements; binding overhang; computable general equilibrium model;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies
F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Hoekman, Bernanrd & Ng, Francis & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2003. "Reducing agrcultural tariffs versus domestic support : what's more important for developing countries?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2918, The World Bank. [Downloadable!]
  2. Mohamed Hedi Bchir & Sébastien Jean & David Laborde, 2006. "Binding Overhang and Tariff-Cutting Formulas," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 207-232, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Lionel Fontagne & Thierry Mayer & Soledad Zignago, 2004. "Trade in the Triad: How Easy is the Access to Large Markets?," Working Papers 2004-04, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Lionel Fontagné & Michael Freudenberg, 1999. "Endogenous Symmetry of Shocks in a Monetary Union," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 263-287, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Hoekman, Bernard & Ng, Francis & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2002. "Reducing Agriculture Tariffs Versus Domestic Support: What's More Important for Developing Countries?," CEPR Discussion Papers 3576, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Francois, Joseph & Martin, Will, 2003. "Formula Approaches for Market Access Negotiations," CEPR Discussion Papers 3720, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  7. Bernard Hoekman & Francis Ng & Marcelo Olarreaga, 2002. "Eliminating Excessive Tariffs on Exports of Least Developed Countries," World Bank Economic Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, June.
    Other versions:
  8. Peter K. Schott, 2004. "Across-product Versus Within-product Specialization in International Trade," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 119(2), pages 646-677, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Harrison, Glenn W & Rutherford, Thomas F & Tarr, David G, 1997. "Quantifying the Uruguay Round," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(444), pages 1405-30, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Joseph Francois & Hans van Meijl & Frank van Tongeren, 2003. "Economic Implications of Trade Liberalization Under the Doha Round," Working Papers 2003-20, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  11. Antoine Bouet & Yvan Decreux & Lionel Fontagne & Sebastien Jean & David Laborde, 2004. "A Consistent, Ad-Valorem Equivalent Measure of Applied Protection Across the World: The MAcMap-HS6 Database," Working Papers 2004-22, CEPII research center. [Downloadable!]
  12. Antoine Bouët & Jean-Christophe Bureau & Yvan Decreux & Sébastien Jean, 2005. "Multilateral Agricultural Trade Liberalisation: The Contrasting Fortunes of Developing Countries in the Doha Round," The World Economy, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 28(9), pages 1329-1354, 09. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Bouët, Antoine, 2006. "What can the poor expect from trade liberalization?: opening the "black box" of trade modeling," MTID discussion papers 93, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Downloadable!]
  2. Goldbaum, Sergio & Coelho, Allexandro Mori & Lima, Maria Lúcia L. M. Pádua & Cury, Samir, 2006. "Impacts of the Proposals For Tariff Reductions in Non-Agricultural Market Access (Nama)," Textos para discussão 155, Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Getulio Vargas Foundation (Brazil). [Downloadable!]
  3. Jayatilleke S. Bandara, 2007. "The Effects of Agricultural Trade Liberalisation under the Doha Development Agenda with Special Reference to the Asia Pacific Region: A Brief Survey," Working Papers 3107, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), an initiative of UNESCAP and IDRC, Canada.. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS indexes over 800000 items of research in Economics alone.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-6.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.