IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/79909.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Will liner ships make fewer port calls per route?

Author

Listed:
  • Mulder, J.
  • Dekker, R.

Abstract

Traditional liner shipping route networks consists of many port calls per route. However, container ship sizes have increased substantially over the past few years. These large container ships benefit from economies of scale at sea, but might suffer diseconomies of scale in ports. Therefore, we investigate whether larger container ships will lead to fewer port calls per route. First, we discuss the influence of fewer port visits on some aspects that are difficult to include in a mathematical analysis. Thereafter, we propose a mathematical approach to obtain networks with fewer port calls per route. Liner shipping route networks are generated by distinguishing between hub routes and regional routes. Hub routes are used to connect a small number of hubs, while regional routes connect all other ports with its nearest hub. An iterative approach is used to generate networks, which are evaluated using a mixed integer program in which the joint ship allocation and cargo routing is solved. A case study is performed with different combinations of seven hub ports. In the case study, three capacity scenarios are considered: low, base and high capacity. Our networks generate profits that are more than 25% higher compared with the best known networks in literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Will liner ships make fewer port calls per route?," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-04, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:79909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/79909/EI2016-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imai, Akio & Shintani, Koichi & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2009. "Multi-port vs. Hub-and-Spoke port calls by containerships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 740-757, September.
    2. Qiang Meng & Shuaian Wang & Henrik Andersson & Kristian Thun, 2014. "Containership Routing and Scheduling in Liner Shipping: Overview and Future Research Directions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 265-280, May.
    3. Kjetil Fagerholt *, 2004. "Designing optimal routes in a liner shipping problem," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 259-268, October.
    4. Jun Xia & Kevin X. Li & Hong Ma & Zhou Xu, 2015. "Joint Planning of Fleet Deployment, Speed Optimization, and Cargo Allocation for Liner Shipping," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 922-938, November.
    5. Marielle Christiansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & David Ronen, 2004. "Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Mulder, Judith & Dekker, Rommert, 2014. "Methods for strategic liner shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 367-377.
    7. Theo E Notteboom, 2006. "The Time Factor in Liner Shipping Services," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 8(1), pages 19-39, March.
    8. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2015. "Liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 32-48.
    9. Gelareh, Shahin & Pisinger, David, 2011. "Fleet deployment, network design and hub location of liner shipping companies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 947-964.
    10. Brouer, Berit Dangaard & Desaulniers, Guy & Pisinger, David, 2014. "A matheuristic for the liner shipping network design problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 42-59.
    11. Bert Vernimmen & Wout Dullaert & Steve Engelen, 2007. "Schedule Unreliability in Liner Shipping: Origins and Consequences for the Hinterland Supply Chain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 9(3), pages 193-213, September.
    12. Ronen, David, 1993. "Ship scheduling: The last decade," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 325-333, December.
    13. Ronen, David, 1983. "Cargo ships routing and scheduling: Survey of models and problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 119-126, February.
    14. Ricardo J. Sanchez & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2011. "Liner Shipping Networks and Market Concentration," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Zhang, Fangjun, 2016. "Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 123-140.
    2. Lee, Chung-Yee & Song, Dong-Ping, 2017. "Ocean container transport in global supply chains: Overview and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 442-474.
    3. Qiang Meng & Shuaian Wang & Henrik Andersson & Kristian Thun, 2014. "Containership Routing and Scheduling in Liner Shipping: Overview and Future Research Directions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 265-280, May.
    4. Zheng, Jianfeng & Qi, Jingwen & Sun, Zhuo & Li, Feng, 2018. "Community structure based global hub location problem in liner shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-19.
    5. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2013. "Container routing in liner shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 1-7.
    6. Sun, Zhuo & Zheng, Jianfeng, 2016. "Finding potential hub locations for liner shipping," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 750-761.
    7. Mulder, J. & Dekker, R., 2016. "Optimization in container liner shipping," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI2016-05, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    8. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2015. "Liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 32-48.
    9. Chen, Jingxu & Jia, Shuai & Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2018. "Subloop-based reversal of port rotation directions for container liner shipping network alteration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 336-361.
    10. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Robust schedule design for liner shipping services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1093-1106.
    11. Mulder, Judith & Dekker, Rommert, 2014. "Methods for strategic liner shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 367-377.
    12. Manuel Herrera & Per J. Agrell & Casiano Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate & Lourdes Trujillo, 2017. "Vessel capacity restrictions in the fleet deployment problem: an application to the Panama Canal," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 253(2), pages 845-869, June.
    13. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Liner ship fleet deployment with container transshipment operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 470-484.
    14. Akyüz, M. Hakan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2016. "Service type assignment and container routing with transit time constraints and empty container repositioning for liner shipping service networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 46-71.
    15. Lee, Chung-Yee & Lee, Hau L. & Zhang, Jiheng, 2015. "The impact of slow ocean steaming on delivery reliability and fuel consumption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 176-190.
    16. Christiansen, Marielle & Hellsten, Erik & Pisinger, David & Sacramento, David & Vilhelmsen, Charlotte, 2020. "Liner shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 1-20.
    17. David F. Koza & Guy Desaulniers & Stefan Ropke, 2020. "Integrated Liner Shipping Network Design and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 512-533, March.
    18. Hellsten, Erik Orm & Sacramento, David & Pisinger, David, 2022. "A branch-and-price algorithm for solving the single-hub feeder network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 902-916.
    19. Christiansen, Marielle & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Nygreen, Bjørn & Ronen, David, 2013. "Ship routing and scheduling in the new millennium," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 467-483.
    20. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2012. "Liner ship route schedule design with sea contingency time and port time uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 615-633.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    liner shipping route networks; capacity scenarios;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:79909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.