IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ema/worpap/2023-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Packaging-free products: when retailers and consumers (re/mis) appropriate the packaging functions

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Monnot
  • Fanny Reniou
  • Sarah Lasri

    (Université de Cergy-Pontoise, THEMA)

Abstract

Purpose – Packaging elimination for selling packaging-free products disrupts the usual distribution and consumption frameworks in which packaging usually plays a central role. This study investigates how retailers and consumers reappropriate packaging and its functions when it disappears. Design/methodology/approach – This research uses a qualitative data collection method with two parts: a netnography of 190 Instagram posts and 54 interviews with experts from packaging-free product stores (N = 10) and consumers (N = 44). Findings – Drawing from the literature on packaging functions and the appropriation theory, this research reveals that actors deploy three appropriation strategies: (1) imitation, a strategy that favors a "utilitarian" function of packaging; (2) adaptation, a strategy that valorizes an "environmental" function of packaging; and (3) creation, a strategy that focuses on an "aesthetic" function of packaging. Finally, this research identifies the dark sides of packaging appropriation in the context of packaging-free products—namely, the damaging effects on health, the environment, and social exclusion. Originality – This research contributes to the literature on packaging on a topic that remains under-investigated (i.e., packaging-free product consumption), though it is a growing trend that questions conventional models of product presentation. The article offers a discussion on (1) the new role of actors in the appropriation of packaging and (2) the ambivalence of the environmental function of packaging-free product consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Monnot & Fanny Reniou & Sarah Lasri, 2023. "Packaging-free products: when retailers and consumers (re/mis) appropriate the packaging functions," THEMA Working Papers 2023-20, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
  • Handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2023-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thema.u-cergy.fr/IMG/pdf/2023-20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fredrik Wikström & Helén Williams & Jakob Trischler & Zane Rowe, 2019. "The Importance of Packaging Functions for Food Waste of Different Products in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/14053 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Amon Rapp & Alessandra Marino & Rossana Simeoni & Federica Cena, 2017. "An ethnographic study of packaging-free purchasing: designing an interactive system to support sustainable social practices," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(11), pages 1193-1217, November.
    5. Elisa Monnot & Fanny Reniou & Béatrice Parguel, 2014. "Consumer responses to elimination of overpackaging on private label products," Working Papers halshs-01076408, HAL.
    6. Louis, Didier & Lombart, Cindy & Durif, Fabien, 2021. "Packaging-free products: A lever of proximity and loyalty between consumers and grocery stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Joonas Rokka & Robin Canniford, 2016. "Heterotopian selfies : How social media destabilizes brand assemblages," Post-Print hal-02313408, HAL.
    8. Didier Louis & Cindy Lombart & Fabien Durif, 2021. "Packaging-free products: A lever of proximity and loyalty between consumers and grocery stores," Post-Print hal-03379616, HAL.
    9. Matthieu Mifsud & Anne-Sophie Cases & Gilles N'Goala, 2015. "Service appropriation: how do customers make the service their own?," Post-Print hal-02011212, HAL.
    10. Gwenaëlle Briand Decré & Caroline Cloonan, 2019. "A touch of gloss: haptic perception of packaging and consumers’ reactions [Les facteurs et les formes de résistance des apprenants à une innovation pédagogique : le cas d’un Business Simulation Gam," Post-Print hal-03780867, HAL.
    11. Fuentes, Christian & Enarsson, Petronella & Kristoffersson, Love, 2019. "Unpacking package free shopping: Alternative retailing and the reinvention of the practice of shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 258-265.
    12. Folkes, Valerie S & Martin, Ingrid M & Gupta, Kamal, 1993. "When to Say When: Effects of Supply on Usage," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 467-477, December.
    13. Gabriele Murtas & Giuseppe Pedeliento & Daniela Andreini, 2022. "To Pack Sustainably or Not to Pack Sustainably? A Review of the Relationship between Consumer Behaviour and Sustainable Packaging," International Series in Advanced Management Studies, in: Beatrice Luceri & Elisa Martinelli (ed.), Managing Sustainability, pages 147-168, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanna Piracci & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2023. "Investigating Consumer Preferences for Sustainable Packaging Through a Different Behavioural Approach: A Random Regret Minimization Application," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 86(1), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Kumar, Prashant & Utkarsh,, 2023. "Effects of in-store information quality and store credibility on consumer engagement in green retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Mifsud, Matthieu & Molines, Mathieu & Cases, Anne-Sophie & N'Goala, Gilles, 2019. "It's MY health care program: Enhancing patient adherence through psychological ownership," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 307-315.
    4. Tang, Honghong & Li, Lin & Su, Song, 2022. "Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-148.
    5. Paweł Brzustewicz & Anupam Singh, 2021. "Sustainable Consumption in Consumer Behavior in the Time of COVID-19: Topic Modeling on Twitter Data Using LDA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    7. Martin P. Fritze & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Martin Benkenstein, 2019. "Digital transformation and possession attachment: examining the endowment effect for consumers’ relationships with hedonic and utilitarian digital service technologies," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 311-337, June.
    8. Song, Jiawen & Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Exploring consumers’ usage intention of reusable express packaging: An extended norm activation model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Nora Nägele & Benjamin Walter & Philipp Scharfenberger & Daniel Wentzel, 2020. "“Touching” services: tangible objects create an emotional connection to services even before their first use," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 741-766, July.
    10. László Bendegúz Nagy & Brigitta Unger-Plasek & Zoltán Lakner & Ágoston Temesi, 2023. "Confidence in organic food: a cross-country choice based conjoint analysis of credibility factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Mangirdas Morkūnas & Marija Kotryna Grišmanauskaite˙, 2023. "What Really Drives Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Market?," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 12(2), pages 197-212, July.
    12. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Bae, Joonheui, 2022. "Human likeness and attachment effect on the perceived interactivity of AI speakers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 797-804.
    13. Shiri Melumad & Michel Tuan Pham & Darren W Dahl & Amna Kirmani & Peter R Darke, 2020. "The Smartphone as a Pacifying Technology [Diagnostic Instruments for Behavioural Addiction: An Overview]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 237-255.
    14. Leah Warfield Smith & Randall Lee Rose & Alex R. Zablah & Heath McCullough & Mohammad “Mike” Saljoughian, 2023. "Examining post-purchase consumer responses to product automation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 530-550, May.
    15. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Ramirez, Germán Contreras & Campbell, Jeffrey & Klaus, Philipp, 2021. "The product is me: Hyper-personalized consumer goods as unconventional luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 446-454.
    16. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2021. "Consumer adoption of electric vehicles in alternative business models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    18. Chen, Zengxiang & Huang, Yunhui, 2016. "Cause-related marketing is not always less favorable than corporate philanthropy: The moderating role of self-construal," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 868-880.
    19. Cherrier, Helene & Türe, Meltem, 2020. "Value dynamics in ordinary object disposal," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 221-228.
    20. Mariek Vanden Abeele & Ralf De Wolf & Rich Ling, 2018. "Mobile Media and Social Space: How Anytime, Anyplace Connectivity Structures Everyday Life," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 5-14.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Packaging; Packaging functions; Packaging-free product consumption; Appropriation; Netnography; Sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ema:worpap:2023-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Marcassa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/themafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.