This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Gender Wage Gaps in the Netherlands with Sample Selection Adjustments

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
James Albrecht
Aico van Vuuren

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In this paper, we use quantile regression methods to analyze the gender gap in the Netherlands. Specifically, we use data from the 1992 wave of the OSA Labour Survey Panel to decompose the difference between the distributions of wages for males and females who are employed full-time. The decomposition technique we use is the Machado and Mata (2000) method, as applied in Albrecht, Bj`rklund and Vroman (2003). There is strong evidence of a glass ceiling effect in the Netherlands; i.e., the gender log wage gap is greater for higher quantiles. Because part-time work is common among women in the Netherlands and because the female participation rate is relatively low, sample selection is a serious issue. We apply Buchinsky’s technique for quantile regression with selectivity bias correction and estimate a series of quantile regressions to find the marginal contributions of individual characteristics to log wages for men and for women at various quantiles in their respective wage distributions. We then use the Machado/Mata technique amended to deal with sample selection to construct a counterfactual distribution, namely, the distribution of wages that would prevail among women were women to work full-time to the same extent as men do. This allows us to decompose the gender gap at different quantiles taking account of sample selection and to determine how much of the gap is due to differences in the labor market characteristics of men and women and how much is due to gender differences in rewards to these characteristics

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings with number 504.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Aug 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:504

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords: Gender Gap; Quantile Regressions; Sample Selection;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
J0 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General
J7 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS uses the data collected within the RePEc project, the largest online bibliographic database in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-6.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.