IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/illbus/06-0120.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the Black Box of Task-Technology Fit: The Case of Mobile Information Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Gebauer, Judith

    (U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

  • Ginsburg, Mark

    (Seventh Rank Associates)

Abstract

Task-technology fit has been developed as a diagnostic tool to determine whether information systems meet user needs, and has been demonstrated to have a positive impact on the effectiveness of various types of information systems, such as group support systems and management support systems. Despite empirical evidence for the relevance of task-technology fit to improve information system effectiveness, the theory of task-technology fit provides little guidance of how to determine and operationalize fit for particular combinations of task and technology. Consequently, the theoretical validity of the concept of task-technology fit remains limited as does its practical applicability. In this paper, we present the results of an inductive study to explore the concept and antecedents of fit for mobile information systems to support mobile professionals. We performed a content analysis of online user reviews of four mobile technology products with the objective to identify issues that are relevant to users. The mobile technology products include a cell-phone, two personal digital assistants (PDAs), and an ultra-light laptop. The identified issues can be grouped into four conceptual constructs: overall user evaluation, task-related fit, context-related fit, and technology performance, and are characterized by a lower level of abstraction than the level of abstraction deployed in previous research studies on task-technology fit. In order to improve our understanding about how to achieve fit for particular combinations of task, use context, and technology we performed several statistical analyses. (1) An exploratory factor analysis yielded five factors, each indeed including a different set of conceptual constructs; (2) a case-wise analysis indicated user-perceived strengths and limits of individual devices with respect to the five factors; and (3) the results of a multiple regression analysis provided insights about the extent to which the five factors were related with overall technology evaluation. The results presented in the current paper will serve as input for a larger survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Gebauer, Judith & Ginsburg, Mark, 2006. "Exploring the Black Box of Task-Technology Fit: The Case of Mobile Information Systems," Working Papers 06-0120, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:illbus:06-0120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.business.illinois.edu/Working_Papers/papers/06-0120.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gebauer, Judith & Shaw, Michael J. & Gribbins, Michele L., 2006. "Task-Technology Fit for Mobile Information Systems," Working Papers 06-0107, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    2. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    2. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque & Smolander, Kari, 2022. "What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Hemant K. Bhargava & Abhay Nath Mishra, 2014. "Electronic Medical Records and Physician Productivity: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2543-2562, October.
    4. Meng Tao & Muhammad Zahid Nawaz & Shahid Nawaz & Asad Hassan Butt & Hassan Ahmad, 2018. "Users’ acceptance of innovative mobile hotel booking trends: UK vs. PRC," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-36, December.
    5. Guenther-Lübbers, Welf & Arens, Ludwig & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2013. "Climate-Adapted Soil Cultivation as an Aspect for Sustainable Farming – Task-Technology-Fit of a Decision Support System," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Liyong Wan & Shoumei Xie & Ai Shu, 2020. "Toward an Understanding of University Students’ Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: When UTAUT Model Meets TTF Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    7. repec:jtr:journl:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:12-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Gao, Changyuan & Zhai, LiLi & Shahzad, Fakhar & Khan, Imran, 2021. "Environmental air pollution management system: Predicting user adoption behavior of big data analytics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.
    10. Shahzad, Khuram & Zhang, Qingyu & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Rehman, Shafique Ur, 2023. "The role of blockchain-enabled traceability, task technology fit, and user self-efficacy in mobile food delivery applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Ozturk, Ahmet Bulent & Bilgihan, Anil & Nusair, Khaldoon & Okumus, Fevzi, 2016. "What keeps the mobile hotel booking users loyal? Investigating the roles of self-efficacy, compatibility, perceived ease of use, and perceived convenience," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1350-1359.
    12. Jackie London & Siyuan Li & Heshan Sun, 2022. "Seems Legit: An Investigation of the Assessing and Sharing of Unverifiable Messages on Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 978-1001, September.
    13. Chen, Xiaomeng & Forman, Christopher & Kummer, Michael E., 2021. "Chat more and contribute better: An empirical study of a knowledge-sharing community," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Lin, Ching-Torng & Wu, Wen-Jui & Cheng, Li-Min, 2015. "Towards understanding integration of heavyweight-product managers and collaboration software in collaborative product development: An empirical study in Taiwan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 156-167.
    15. Pitafi, Abdul Hameed & Kanwal, Shamsa & Ali, Ahsan & Khan, Ali Nawaz & Waqas Ameen, Muhammad, 2018. "Moderating roles of IT competency and work cooperation on employee work performance in an ESM environment," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 199-208.
    16. Brooks, Patti & El-Gayar, Omar & Sarnikar, Surendra, 2015. "A framework for developing a domain specific business intelligence maturity model: Application to healthcare," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 337-345.
    17. Thuy Duong Oesterreich & Eduard Anton & Julian Schuir & Alexander Brehm & Frank Teuteberg, 2023. "How can I help you? Design principles for task-oriented speech dialog systems in customer service," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 37-79, March.
    18. Peter Verhoeven & Florian Sinn & Tino T. Herden, 2018. "Examples from Blockchain Implementations in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Exploring the Mindful Use of a New Technology," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Rana, Omer F. & Ranjan, Rajiv & Morgan, Graham, 2022. "“Alexa, let’s talk about my productivity”: The impact of digital assistants on work productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 572-584.
    20. Gebauer, Judith & Tang, Ya, 2007. "Applying the Theory of Task-Technology Fit to Mobile Technology: The Role of User Mobility," Working Papers 07-0114, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    21. Yu-Shan Chen & Stanley Y.B. Huang, 2017. "The effect of task-technology fit on purchase intention: The moderating role of perceived risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(11), pages 1418-1438, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:illbus:06-0120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbuiuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.