IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dur/durham/2006_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Militancy and Moderation in Teacher's Unions: Is there a fit between Union image and member attitudes?

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Redman

    (Durham Business School)

  • Ed Snape

    (Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

Abstract

This paper provides a comparison of member attitudes in the Professional Association of Teachers (PAT) and the National Unions of Teachers (NUT), often seen as the most "moderate" and "militant" teacher unions respectively. Findings suggest that members of PAT were higher in job satisfaction, and both organizational and professional commitment, with NUT members higher in union citizenship behaviour (UCB) and general pro-union attitudes. For NUT members, pro-union beliefs had a significantly stronger effect on union commitment, and union commitment on UCB. These findings are consistent with the relative images of the two unions, and also with Bamberger et al.’s (1999) suggestion that the nature of the membership is likely to moderate the antecedents of union commitment and participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Redman & Ed Snape, 2006. "Militancy and Moderation in Teacher's Unions: Is there a fit between Union image and member attitudes?," Working Papers 2006_01, Durham University Business School.
    • Handle: RePEc:dur:durham:2006_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dro.dur.ac.uk/10373
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William S. Fox & Michael H. Wince, 1976. "The Structure and Determinants of Occupational Militancy among Public School Teachers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 30(1), pages 47-58, October.
    2. Samuel Bacharach & Peter Bamberger & Sharon Conley, 1990. "Professionals and Workplace Control: Organizational and Demographic Models of Teacher Militancy," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 43(5), pages 570-586, October.
    3. Joseph A. Alutto & James A. Belasco, 1974. "Determinants of Attitudinal Militancy among Nurses and Teachers," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 27(2), pages 216-227, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Brown & John Sessions, 2000. "Employee militancy in Britain: 1985-1990," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(13), pages 1767-1774.
    2. Tom Redman & Ed Snape, 2014. "The antecedents of union commitment and participation: evaluating moderation effects across unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 486-506, November.
    3. Freeman, Richard B, 1986. "Unionism Comes to the Public Sector," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 24(1), pages 41-86, March.
    4. Alexei Kolokolov, 2011. "Futures hedging: Multivariate GARCH with dynamic conditional correlations (in Russian)," Quantile, Quantile, issue 9, pages 61-75, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dur:durham:2006_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deduruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.