IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cwl/cwldpp/391.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Acyclic Aggregation over Finite Sets of Alternatives

Author

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald J. Brown, 1975. "Acyclic Aggregation over Finite Sets of Alternatives," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 391, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  • Handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/pub/d03/d0391.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donald J. Brown, 1975. "Aggregation of Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 89(3), pages 456-469.
    2. J. Craven, 1971. "Majority Voting and Social Choice," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 38(2), pages 265-267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Weymark, 1984. "Arrow's theorem with social quasi-orderings," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 235-246, January.
    2. Bruno Leclerc & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Aggregation and residuation," Post-Print halshs-00504982, HAL.
    3. Gerald H. Kramer, 1975. "A Dynamical Model of Political Equilibrium," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 396, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    4. Roy Gardner, 1983. "Variation of the electorate: Veto and purge," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 237-247, January.
    5. A. J. McGann, 2004. "The Tyranny of the Supermajority," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 16(1), pages 53-77, January.
    6. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2010. "Guilbaud's 1952 theorem on the logical problem of aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00504959, HAL.
    7. Susumu Cato, 2013. "Quasi-decisiveness, quasi-ultrafilter, and social quasi-orderings," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(1), pages 169-202, June.
    8. Sholomov, Lev A., 2000. "Explicit form of neutral social decision rules for basic rationality conditions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 81-107, January.
    9. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2018. "On some oligarchy results when social preference is fuzzy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(4), pages 717-735, December.
    10. Jun Iritani & Tomoyuki Kamo & Ryo-ichi Nagahisa, 2013. "Vetoer and tie-making group theorems for indifference-transitive aggregation rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(1), pages 155-171, January.
    11. Gardner, Roy, 1979. "Onymous Consistent Voting Systems," ISU General Staff Papers 197903010800001088, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2007. "Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 391-424, October.
    13. Bonifacio Llamazares, 2013. "On the structure of voting systems between two alternatives," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(3), pages 239-248, September.
    14. Bossert, Walter & Cato, Susumu, 2020. "Acyclicity, anonymity, and prefilters," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 134-141.
    15. Llamazares, Bonifacio, 2006. "The forgotten decision rules: Majority rules based on difference of votes," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 311-326, May.
    16. Susumu Cato, 2016. "Weak independence and the Pareto principle," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 295-314, August.
    17. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley, 2022. "Collective choice rules with social maximality," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2022. "Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 319-347, March.
    19. Phoebe Koundouri & Georgios I. Papayiannis & Electra V. Petracou & Athanasios N. Yannacopoulos, 2023. "Consensus group decision making under model uncertainty with a view towards environmental policy making," Papers 2312.00436, arXiv.org.
    20. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Heal, Geoffrey, 1983. "Necessary and sufficient conditions for a resolution of the social choice paradox," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 68-87, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brittany Ladd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cowleus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.