IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cue/wpaper/awp-07-2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Knowledge-Centric Practices of Performing Arts Organizations: New Directions for Organizational Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Neville K. Vakharia

    (Drexel University, USA)

  • Marilena Vecco

    (Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Andrej Srakar

    (Institute for Economic Research, Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Divya Janardhan

    (The Ohio State University, USA)

Abstract

This paper explores the concepts of knowledge-centric organizations in the performing arts sector as a means to understand how specific organizational practices relate to measures of financial and operational performance. Using the authors’ prior framework of a knowledge-centric arts organization, a quantitative study of 368 small and mid-sized non-profit performing arts organizations in the United States was conducted via primary data on 36 organizational practices and secondary data on 21 performance metrics. A statistical analysis using structural equation models found several distinct performance metrics’ dimensions that are statistically associated with knowledge-centric practices, in particular related to board contribution, the resilience of the organization and attendance. On the other hand, no relationship was confirmed with monetary performance measures. We were also able to show some important correlations between demographic characteristics of organizations and their usage of knowledge-centric practices. These findings can serve as a basis to further investigate how organizations can remain sustainable and operate effectively in a knowledge-driven society.

Suggested Citation

  • Neville K. Vakharia & Marilena Vecco & Andrej Srakar & Divya Janardhan, 2016. "Knowledge-Centric Practices of Performing Arts Organizations: New Directions for Organizational Resilience," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-07-2016, Association for Cultural Economics International, revised Jul 2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-07-2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://files.culturaleconomics.org/papers/AWP-07-2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mary Ann Glynn, 2000. "When Cymbals Become Symbols: Conflict Over Organizational Identity Within a Symphony Orchestra," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 285-298, June.
    2. Ramiro Montealegre, 2002. "A Process Model of Capability Development: Lessons from the Electronic Commerce Strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(5), pages 514-531, October.
    3. Bertrand Moingeon & Bernard Ramanantsoa & E. Metais & Douglas Orton, 1998. "Another look at strategy–Structure relationships:: The resource-Based view," Post-Print hal-00465884, HAL.
    4. Moingeon, Bertrand & Ramanantsoa, Bernard & Métais, Emmanuel & Orton, J. Douglas, 1998. "Another look at strategy-Structure relationships:: The resource-Based view," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 297-305, June.
    5. Edward H. Bowman & Constance E. Helfat, 2001. "Does corporate strategy matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Burton-Jones, Alan, 2001. "Knowledge Capitalism: Business, Work, and Learning in the New Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199242542.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karim Moustaghfir, 2012. "Explicating Knowledge-based Competitive Advantage," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 1(1), pages 23-38.
    2. Alev Ozer Torgaloz & Mehmet Fatih Acar & Cemil Kuzey, 2023. "The effects of organizational learning culture and decentralization upon supply chain collaboration: analysis of covid-19 period," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 511-530, March.
    3. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2021. "Strategy implementation: A review and an introductory framework," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 22-33.
    4. Omar Neme-Castillo & Ana Lilia Valderrama-Santibáñez & Cesaire Chiatchoua, 2021. "Análisis de las competencias núcleo y el desarrollo empresarial en las MIPES: estudio de caso," Revista CEA, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, vol. 7(13), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    6. Yi-Min Chen, 2008. "How Much Does Country Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(4), pages 404-435, October.
    7. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    8. Cecilia Varendh-Mansson & Tyler Wry & Ariane Szafarz, 2020. "Anchors Aweigh? Then Time to Head Upstream Why we Need to Theorize “Mission” before “Drift”," Working Papers CEB PostPrintCEB024, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Bövers, Jana & Hoon, Christina, 2021. "Surviving disruptive change: The role of history in aligning strategy and identity in family businesses," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(4).
    10. Greta Hsu & Kimberly D. Elsbach, 2013. "Explaining Variation in Organizational Identity Categorization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 996-1013, August.
    11. Yosr Ben Tahar & Sarah Mussol, 2017. "Entrepreneurial storytelling : A mean for legitimacy and opportunity exploitation [Le storytelling entrepreneurial: un moyen de légitimation et d'exploitation des opportunités]," Post-Print hal-01625964, HAL.
    12. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    13. Bauer, Florian & King, David & Matzler, Kurt, 2016. "Speed of acquisition integration: Separating the role of human and task integration," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 150-165.
    14. Bai, Xiaoou & Tsang, Eric W.K. & Xia, Wei, 2020. "Domestic versus foreign listing: Does a CEO's educational experience matter?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    15. Snejina Michailova & Elena Sidorova, 2010. "Knowledge Management In Transition Economies: Selected Key Issues And Possible Research Avenues," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 1(1).
    16. Claudio Vitari, 2009. "It Dynamic Capability Development In The Context Of Data Genesis Capability," Post-Print hal-00463282, HAL.
    17. Samuel Y. Todd & Tamara A. Crook & Tony Lachowetz, 2013. "Agency Theory Explanations of Self-Serving Sales Forecast Inaccuracies," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 13-21, June.
    18. Verena Komander & Andreas König, 2024. "Organizations on stage: organizational research and the performing arts," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 303-352, February.
    19. Dmitry Sharapov & Paul Kattuman & Diego Rodriguez & F. Javier Velazquez, 2021. "Using the SHAPLEY value approach to variance decomposition in strategy research: Diversification, internationalization, and corporate group effects on affiliate profitability," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 608-623, March.
    20. Caldart, Adrian & Ricart, Joan E., 2003. "Corporate strategy revisited: A view from complexity theory," IESE Research Papers D/528, IESE Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knowledge Centricity; Organizational Performance; Knowledge Management; Performing Arts; Structural Equation Models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • G31 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Capital Budgeting; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • C43 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Index Numbers and Aggregation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cue:wpaper:awp-07-2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Crosby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aceiiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.