IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/issbrf/ib2010-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Did Poverty Drop for the Elderly?

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia H. Munnell
  • April Wu
  • Joshua Hurwitz

Abstract

The Census Bureau just reported a large increase in poverty in the United States. Driven by job loss and long-term unemployment, the poverty rate rose from 13.2 percent to 14.3 percent, as 3.7 million more Americans found themselves with incomes below the poverty threshold.1 Individuals aged 55-64 followed the national trend as they shared in job losses. Those 65 and over, however, saw a decline in their poverty rate. This outcome was the result of the timing of two different adjustments to reflect changes in consumer prices – an extraordinarily large cost-of-living adjust­ment (COLA) awarded to Social Security beneficiaries in 2009 and a decline in the index used to adjust the poverty threshold for 2009. This pattern is likely to be reversed in the future as Social Security beneficiaries receive no COLAs in 2010 and 2011 and the poverty threshold increases. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first sec­tion describes the poverty thresholds and how they are adjusted over time. The second section discusses the importance of Social Security for low-income elderly and how Social Security benefits are adjusted for inflation. The third section speculates about how the indexing procedures are likely to affect the poverty rate of older Americans in 2010 and 2011.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia H. Munnell & April Wu & Joshua Hurwitz, 2010. "Why Did Poverty Drop for the Elderly?," Issues in Brief ib2010-16, Center for Retirement Research, revised Sep 2010.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2010-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/why-did-poverty-drop-for-the-elderly/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    savings and consumption;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2010-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.