IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/com/wpaper/043.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Generalized Decision Rule Approximations for Stochastic Programming via Liftings

Author

Listed:
  • Angelos Georghiou
  • Wolfram Wiesemann
  • Daniel Kuhn

Abstract

Stochastic programming provides a versatile framework for decision-making under uncertainty, but the resulting optimization problems can be computationally demanding. It has recently been shown that, primal and dual linear decision rule approximations can yield tractable upper and lower bounds on the optimal value of a stochastic program. Unfortunately, linear decision rules often provide crude approximations that result in loose bounds. To address this problem, we propose a lifting technique that maps a given stochastic program to an equivalent problem on a higherdimensional probability space. We prove that solving the lifted problem in primal and dual linear decision rules provides tighter bounds than those obtained from applying linear decision rules to the original problem. We also show that there is a one-to-one correspondence between linear decision rules in the lifted problem and families of non-linear decision rules in the original problem. Finally, we identify structured liftings that give rise to highly flexible piecewise linear decision rules and assess their performance in the context of a stylized investment planning problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelos Georghiou & Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn, 2010. "Generalized Decision Rule Approximations for Stochastic Programming via Liftings," Working Papers 043, COMISEF.
  • Handle: RePEc:com:wpaper:043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://comisef.eu/files/wps043.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "A Linear Decision-Based Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 344-357, April.
    2. Xin Chen & Yuhan Zhang, 2009. "Uncertain Linear Programs: Extended Affinely Adjustable Robust Counterparts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1469-1482, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robin Vujanic & Paul Goulart & Manfred Morari, 2016. "Robust Optimization of Schedules Affected by Uncertain Events," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1033-1054, December.
    2. Paula Rocha & Daniel Kuhn, 2013. "A Polynomial-Time Solution Scheme for Quadratic Stochastic Programs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 576-589, August.
    3. Shao-Wei Lam & Tsan Sheng Ng & Melvyn Sim & Jin-Hwa Song, 2013. "Multiple Objectives Satisficing Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 214-227, February.
    4. Rocha, Paula & Kuhn, Daniel, 2012. "Multistage stochastic portfolio optimisation in deregulated electricity markets using linear decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 397-408.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walid Ben-Ameur & Adam Ouorou & Guanglei Wang & Mateusz Żotkiewicz, 2018. "Multipolar robust optimization," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(4), pages 395-434, December.
    2. Rahal, Said & Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. & Li, Zukui, 2021. "Hybrid strategies using linear and piecewise-linear decision rules for multistage adaptive linear optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1014-1030.
    3. Haolin Ruan & Zhi Chen & Chin Pang Ho, 2023. "Adjustable Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1002-1023, September.
    4. Jianzhe Zhen & Ahmadreza Marandi & Danique de Moor & Dick den Hertog & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2022. "Disjoint Bilinear Optimization: A Two-Stage Robust Optimization Perspective," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2410-2427, September.
    5. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2011. "Robust Optimization Made Easy with ROME," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 973-985, August.
    6. Álvaro Lorca & X. Andy Sun & Eugene Litvinov & Tongxin Zheng, 2016. "Multistage Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 32-51, February.
    7. Ayşe N. Arslan & Boris Detienne, 2022. "Decomposition-Based Approaches for a Class of Two-Stage Robust Binary Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 857-871, March.
    8. Farough Motamed Nasab & Zukui Li, 2023. "Multistage Adaptive Robust Binary Optimization: Uncertainty Set Lifting versus Partitioning through Breakpoints Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Josette Ayoub & Michael Poss, 2016. "Decomposition for adjustable robust linear optimization subject to uncertainty polytope," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 219-239, April.
    10. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim & Meilin Zhang, 2019. "Adaptive Distributionally Robust Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 604-618, February.
    11. Angelos Georghiou & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "The decision rule approach to optimization under uncertainty: methodology and applications," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 545-576, October.
    12. Mengshi Lu & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2021. "A Review of Robust Operations Management under Model Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1927-1943, June.
    13. Angelos Georghiou & Angelos Tsoukalas & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2020. "A Primal–Dual Lifting Scheme for Two-Stage Robust Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 572-590, March.
    14. Angelos Georghiou & Angelos Tsoukalas & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "Robust Dual Dynamic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 813-830, May.
    15. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization and Its Tractable Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 902-917, August.
    16. Han, Biao & Shang, Chao & Huang, Dexian, 2021. "Multiple kernel learning-aided robust optimization: Learning algorithm, computational tractability, and usage in multi-stage decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1004-1018.
    17. Zhi Chen & Melvyn Sim & Huan Xu, 2019. "Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1328-1344, September.
    18. Gauvin, Charles & Delage, Erick & Gendreau, Michel, 2017. "Decision rule approximations for the risk averse reservoir management problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 317-336.
    19. Yanikoglu, I., 2014. "Robust optimization methods for chance constrained, simulation-based, and bilevel problems," Other publications TiSEM 45826f7e-6e21-481e-889e-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri & Michael R. Wagner, 2017. "Closed-Form Solutions for Robust Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1625-1643, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:com:wpaper:043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anil Khuman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.comisef.eu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.