IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_7017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taxing Direct Sales of Digital Services: A Plea for Regulated and Internationally Coordinated Profit Splitting

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfram F. Richter

Abstract

The employment of capital is rival in nature. Small countries do not benefit from taxing its employment. By contrast, the use of digital services is non-rival and small countries do benefit from taxing expenditures on such services. In fact, some countries have already decided to tax digital activities. If such practice spreads, the development of digital services is negatively affected. It is argued that countries exporting digital services have reason to respond by promoting an international tax regime in which the right of taxing the profit earned on the direct sales of digital services is split between the countries involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfram F. Richter, 2018. "Taxing Direct Sales of Digital Services: A Plea for Regulated and Internationally Coordinated Profit Splitting," CESifo Working Paper Series 7017, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp7017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ligthart, J.E., 2004. "Consumption Taxation in a Digital World : A Primer," Other publications TiSEM 46537bf7-4822-4dbe-b3fa-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Clemens Fuest, 2008. "The European Commission's proposal for a common consolidated corporate tax base," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(4), pages 720-739, winter.
    3. McLure, Charles E, Jr, 2003. "The Value Added Tax on Electronic Commerce in the European Union," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 753-762, November.
    4. Wolfram F. Richter, 2017. "Taxing Intellectual Property in the Global Economy: A Plea for Regulated and Internationally Coordinated Profit Splitting," CESifo Working Paper Series 6564, CESifo.
    5. Ciftci, Mustafa & Cready, William M., 2011. "Scale effects of R&D as reflected in earnings and returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 62-80, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolfram F. Richter, 2019. "The Economics of the Digital Services Tax," CESifo Working Paper Series 7863, CESifo.
    2. Haufler, Andreas & Runkel, Marco, 2012. "Firms' financial choices and thin capitalization rules under corporate tax competition," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1087-1103.
    3. Redoano, Michela, 2012. "Fiscal Interactions Among European Countries: Does the EU Matter?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 102, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    4. Johannes Becker & Ronald B Davies, 2014. "A negotiation-based model of tax-induced transfer pricing," Working Papers 1409, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    5. Denise A. Jones, 2018. "Using real options theory to explain patterns in the valuation of research and development expenditures," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 575-593, October.
    6. Oh, Jong-Min, 2017. "Absorptive capacity, technology spillovers, and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 146-164.
    7. Chen, Shihua & Chen, Yulin & Jebran, Khalil, 2021. "Trust and corporate social responsibility: From expected utility and social normative perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 518-530.
    8. Roland Standert, 2020. "R&D Spending and Stock Returns: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 68-75.
    9. David R. Agrawal & William F. Fox, 2017. "Taxes in an e-commerce generation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 24(5), pages 903-926, September.
    10. repec:ces:ifodic:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:19149984 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Leon Bettendorf & Albert Van Der Horst & Ruud A. De Mooij & Hendrik Vrijburg, 2010. "Corporate Tax Consolidation and Enhanced Cooperation in the European Union," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 453-479, December.
    12. Michael P. Devereux & Simon Loretz, 2012. "How Would EU Corporate Tax Reform Affect US Investment in Europe?," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 26, pages 59-91, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Shih‐Chu Chou & Yu‐Fang Chu, 2022. "Innovations and earnings non‐synchronicity: evidence from industry M&A activities," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 337-367, March.
    14. Buettner, Thiess & Riedel, Nadine & Runkel, Marco, 2011. "Strategic Consolidation Under Formula Apportionment," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 64(2), pages 225-254, June.
    15. Matthias Wrede, 2009. "Multinational Capital Structure and Tax Competition," MAGKS Papers on Economics 200934, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    16. Moutinho, Ricardo & Au-Yong-Oliveira, Manuel & Coelho, Arnaldo & Manso, José Pires, 2015. "Beyond the “Innovation's Black-Box”: Translating R&D outlays into employment and economic growth," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 45-58.
    17. Chan, Konan & Lin, Yueh-Hsiang & Wang, Yanzhi, 2017. "Limits-to-arbitrage, investment frictions, and innovation anomalies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-14.
    18. Wei-Chuan Kao, 2018. "Innovation quality of firms with the research and development tax credit," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 43-78, July.
    19. Katarzyna Prędkiewicz & Paweł Prędkiewicz, 2014. "The Patents and Financial Performance of Firms - Evidence From Polish Manufacturing Companies," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 10(4), pages 115-141.
    20. Ortmann, Regina & Pummerer, Erich, 2015. "Formula apportionment or separate accounting? Tax-induced distortions of multinationals' locational investment decisions," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 198, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    21. Elisabeth Gugl & George R. Zodrow, 2014. "The Efficiency of “Benefit-Related” Business Taxes," Working Papers 1406, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    taxing digital services; import tax; tax exemption; profit splitting; Shapley value;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.