IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/sticas/case110.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

From Beveridge to Turner: Demography, Distribution and the Future of Pensions in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • John Hills

Abstract

This article outlines the recommendations of the UK Pensions Commission, and the data and analysis on which they were based, including projections of demographic change, trends in private pension saving, and evolution of the state pension system. The Commission concluded that without reform, structural problems with UK pensions would lead to increasingly inadequate and inequitable provision in 15-20 years time. It recommended reforms which would lead to a more generous, more universal and less means-tested state system than would otherwise evolve, and the establishment of a low cost National Pension Savings Scheme, into which employees without good employer provision would automatically be enrolled. The proposals, which have now largely been adopted by the UK government, imply eventual increases both in state spending on pensions as a share of national income and in State Pension Age, but accompanied by measures to facilitate later and more flexible retirement.

Suggested Citation

  • John Hills, 2006. "From Beveridge to Turner: Demography, Distribution and the Future of Pensions in the UK," CASE Papers case110, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:sticas:case110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/CASEpaper110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutherland H, 2004. "Poverty in Britain: the impact of government policy since 1997 A projection to 2004-5 using microsimulation," Microsimulation Unit Research Notes MU/RN/44, Microsimulation Unit at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    2. Hills, John & Ditch, John & Glennerster, Howard (ed.), 1994. "Beveridge and Social Security: An International Retrospective," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198288060.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marianne A. Ferber & Patricia Simpson, 2009. "Whither Systemic Reform? A Critical Review of the Literature on the Distributional and Income Adequacy Effects of Systemic Pension Reforms," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 20(3), pages 254-276.
    2. Eich, Frank & Swarup, Amarendra, 2009. "Back to the drawing board: The economic crisis and its implications for pension provision in the United Kingdom," EconStor Preprints 54559, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hills, John, 2006. "From Beveridge to Turner: demography, distribution and the future of pensions in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 5562, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. John Hills, 2003. "Inclusion or Insurance? National Insurance and the future of the contributory principle," CASE Papers case68, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    3. John Hills, 2006. "From Beveridge to Turner: demography, distribution and the future of pensions in the UK," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 663-679, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Demographic change; Pensions; Retirement incomes; Social security;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:sticas:case110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/case/_new/publications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.