IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt9q08w58z.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Survey of Universal Basic Mobility Programs and Pilots in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Rodier, Caroline PhD
  • Tovar, Angelly J.
  • Fuller, Sam
  • D'Agostino, Mollie C.
  • Harold, Brian S.

Abstract

A lack of reliable and affordable transportation exacerbates socioeconomic inequities for low-income individuals, especially people of color. Universal Basic Mobility (UBM) pilots or programs are a relatively new approach to addressing financial barriers to travel among the transport-disadvantaged. UBMs provide individuals with funds for various mobilityoptions, including transit and shared modes. This study reviews the UBM programs and pilots implemented in the United States. It also reviews international applications of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) platforms. These platforms may reduce the administrative cost of implementing UBMs and help users identify and compare available travel options. In addition, the review describes critical program design tradeoffs to consider when developing a UBM program or pilot. Finally, key UBM elements and lessons learned are summarized to assist other communities considering UBMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodier, Caroline PhD & Tovar, Angelly J. & Fuller, Sam & D'Agostino, Mollie C. & Harold, Brian S., 2024. "A Survey of Universal Basic Mobility Programs and Pilots in the United States," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9q08w58z, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9q08w58z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9q08w58z.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences; Universal Basic Mobility; Mobility as a Service; transportation disadvantaged persons; transportation equity; pilot studies; user side subsidies;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt9q08w58z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.