IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bwp/bwppap/esid-076-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The politics of negotiating gender equity in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Sohela Nazneen
  • Rezwan Masud

Abstract

In Bangladesh there is a paradox when it comes to securing gender-inclusive development outcomes. Since 1991, women have occupied the highest political office and women’s presence is increasing, due to the existence of gender quotas. Women’s movement actors have a long history of mobilisation for women’s rights and securing progressive changes. However, this overlooks the complex ways in which power and politics operate in Bangladesh, including the difficulties of mobilising women as a political force in a patriarchal, informalised, clientelist context. Women, as a political group, have little to offer the ruling elites in Bangladesh: they do not vote as a block; gender equity concerns have little currency in mainstream politics; and women’s organisations are weak actors in the formal political arena. This paper investigates two successful policy cases – the Domestic Violence Act 2010, and the expansion of access to primary education for girls – to investigate what led the state to address gender equity concerns successfully in some policy areas in a competitive clientelist context? What role, if any, did women and their allies play to make these changes happen? Why do some failures in implementation persist? Findings indicate that the alignment between each policy reform and the dominant interests and ideas of the ruling coalition influenced the capacity and commitment accorded to each agenda. Progress on passing the Domestic Violence Act was made through the high degree of personal, historical and informal relations with supportive people in government. Opportunity was created by a key moment of state formation which opened up an absence of partisan politicking and a supportive advocate at the centre of government. Expansion of girls’ access to primary education was carried along by a wave of political support for the expansion agenda, which fitted closely with powerful political logics concerning ideas, patronage, distribution, legitimacy and international support. In both cases, transnational actors, events and discourses are able to tip the balance in favour of women’s rights, and South-South exchanges can play a vital role in promoting women’s rights. Both cases reveal how the political settlement has shaped the promotion of gender equity in Bangladesh, and the value of moving beyond the usual focus on the impact of gender quotas and the effectiveness of state gender machinery, to the deeper forms of politics and power relations that shape progress on this front.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohela Nazneen & Rezwan Masud, 2017. "The politics of negotiating gender equity in Bangladesh," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-076-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
  • Handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:esid-076-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.effective-states.org/wp-content/uploads/working_papers/final-pdfs/esid_wp_76_nazneen_masud.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levy, Brian, 2014. "Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199363810.
    2. Mirza Hassan, 2013. "Political settlement dynamics in a limited-access order: The case of Bangladesh," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-023-13, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gregory, Julian & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Rethinking the governance of energy poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: Reviewing three academic perspectives on electricity infrastructure investment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 344-354.
    2. Niheer Dasandi & Ed Laws & Heather Marquette & Mark Robinson, 2019. "What Does the Evidence Tell Us about ‘Thinking and Working Politically’ in Development Assistance?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 155-168.
    3. Benjamin Chemouni, 2017. "The politics of core public sector reform in Rwanda," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-088-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    4. Matt Andrews & Lant Pritchett & Michael Woolcock, 2016. "Scaling PDIA through Broad Agency, and Your Role," CID Working Papers 315, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    5. Yanguas, Pablo & Hulme, David, 2015. "Barriers to Political Analysis in Aid Bureaucracies: From Principle to Practice in DFID and the World Bank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 209-219.
    6. Hakiman, Kamran & Sheely, Ryan, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Participatory Planning: How Flexible and Adaptive Governance Interventions Can Work in Practice," OSF Preprints kucjs, Center for Open Science.
    7. Daniel Appiah & Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai, 2017. "Competitive clientelism and the politics of core public sector reform in Ghana," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-082-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    8. Kate Pruce & Sam Hickey, 2016. "The politics of promoting social protection in Zambia," WIDER Working Paper Series 156, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Bala Yanusa Yusuf & David Hulme, 2019. "Service delivery reform in Nigeria: The rise and fall of the Conditional Grant Scheme to Local Government Areas (CGS to LGAs)," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-114-19, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    10. Beatrix Allah-Mensah & Rhoda Osei-Afful, 2017. "A political settlement approach to gender empowerment: The case of the Domestic Violence Act and girls’ education policy in Ghana," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-091-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    11. Lawson, Andrew & Harris, Jamelia, 2023. "Is the problem driven iterative adaptation approach (PDIA) a panacea for public financial management reform? Evidence from six African countries," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    12. repec:ilo:ilowps:487627 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Robert Cameron & Brian Levy, 2016. "The potential and limits of performance management: Improving basic education in the Western Cape," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-062-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    14. Kate Pruce & Sam Hickey, 2017. "The politics of promoting social protection in Zambia," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-075-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    15. Abdul‐Gafaru Abdulai, 2024. "Overcoming the constraints of competitive clientelism? Explaining the success of Ghana's poorest region in reducing maternal mortality," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 363-379, March.
    16. Sam Hickey & Badru Bukenya, 2021. "The politics of promoting social cash transfers in Uganda: The potential and pitfalls of “thinking and working politically”," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(S1), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Brian Levy & Alan Hirsch & Ingrid Woolard, 2015. "Governance and inequality: Benchmarking and interpreting South Africa’s evolving political settlement," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-051-15, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    18. Sam Hickey & Badru Bukenya, 2016. "The politics of promoting social cash transfers in Uganda," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-118, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Tim Kelsall & Sothy Khieng & Chuong Chantha & Tieng Tek Muy, 2016. "The political economy of primary education reform in Cambodia," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-058-16, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    20. Zukiswa Kota & Monica Hendricks & Eric Matambo & Vinothan Naidoo, 2017. "The governance of basic education in the Eastern Cape," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-083-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    21. Anthony Bebbington & Abdul-Gafaru Abdulai & Marja Hinfelaar & Denise Humphreys Bebbington & Cynthia Sanborn, 2017. "Political settlements and the governance of extractive industry: A comparative analysis of the longue duree in Africa and Latin America," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series esid-081-17, GDI, The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bwp:bwppap:esid-076-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rowena Harding (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wpmanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.