IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aoz/wpaper/274.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Arrangements in Economic Theory: Level-Agnostic Representation

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Tohmé

    (UNS/CONICET)

Abstract

If Economics is understood as the study of the interactions among intentional agents, being rationality the main source of intentional behavior, the mathematical tools that it requires must be extended to capture systemic effects. Here we choose an alternative toolbox based on Category Theory. We examine potential level-agnostic formalisms, presenting three categories, PR, G and an encompassing one, PR - G. The latter allows for representing dynamic rearrangements of the interactions among different agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Tohmé, 2023. "Dynamic Arrangements in Economic Theory: Level-Agnostic Representation," Working Papers 274, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    • Handle: RePEc:aoz:wpaper:274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rednie.eco.unc.edu.ar/files/DT/274.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georg Nöldeke & Larry Samuelson, 2018. "The Implementation Duality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 1283-1324, July.
    2. Rozen, Victor & Zhitomirski, Grigori, 2006. "A category theory approach to derived preference relations in some decision making problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 257-273, May.
    3. Leonid Hurwicz, 1996. "Institutions As Families Of Game Forms," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 113-132, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Tohm'e, 2023. "Dynamic Arrangements in Economic Theory: Level-Agnostic Representations," Papers 2309.06383, arXiv.org.
    2. Tohmé Fernando, 2023. "Dynamic Arrangements in Economic Theory: Level-Agnostic Representations," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4694, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    3. Otto Brøns-Petersen & Søren Havn Gjedsted, 2021. "Climate change and institutional change: what is the relative importance for economic performance?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 333-360, April.
    4. Chambers, Christopher P. & Miller, Alan D. & Yenmez, M. Bumin, 2020. "Closure and preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 161-166.
    5. Akira Matsushita & Kei Ikegami & Kyohei Okumura & Yoji Tomita & Atsushi Iwasaki, 2022. "Regulating Matching Markets with Constraints: Data-driven Taxation," Papers 2205.14387, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    6. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Antonella Rita Ferrara & Rosanna Nisticò, 2019. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Multidimensional Well-Being Inequalities? Insights from Italy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 1063-1105, October.
    8. Alexander V. Kolesnikov & Fedor Sandomirskiy & Aleh Tsyvinski & Alexander P. Zimin, 2022. "Beckmann's approach to multi-item multi-bidder auctions," Papers 2203.06837, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    9. Xinyang Wang, 2020. "Cooperation in Small Groups -- an Optimal Transport Approach," Papers 2005.11244, arXiv.org.
    10. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour, 2001. "Fallback Bargaining," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 287-316, July.
    11. Demuynck, Thomas & Potoms, Tom, 2020. "Weakening transferable utility: The case of non-intersecting Pareto curves," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Pierre-Andr'e Chiappori & Robert McCann & Brendan Pass, 2016. "Multidimensional matching," Papers 1604.05771, arXiv.org.
    13. Roswitha King, 2010. "Regional business development policy in Central and Eastern Europe: a mechanism design perspective," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 221-242, March.
    14. Anatolii Mazaraki & Yuliya Drozdova & Sergey Bay, 2020. "Theoretical And Methodological Principles For Assessment The Readiness Of Socio-Economic Systems For Changes," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 6(1).
    15. Malik, Komal & Mishra, Debasis, 2021. "Pareto efficient combinatorial auctions: Dichotomous preferences without quasilinearity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Dai, Darong, 2012. "Comparative Studies on Cooperative Stochastic Differential Game and Dynamic Sequential Game of Economic Maturity," MPRA Paper 44339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2006. "Social science knowledge and induced institutional innovation: an institutional design perspective," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 249-272, December.
    18. Alfred Galichon & Larry Samuelson & Lucas Vernet, 2022. "The Existence of Equilibrium Flows," Working Papers hal-03936063, HAL.
    19. Carlier, Guillaume & Zhang, Kelvin Shuangjian, 2020. "Existence of solutions to principal–agent problems with adverse selection under minimal assumptions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 64-71.
    20. Yannai A. Gonczarowski & Scott Duke Kominers & Ran I. Shorrer, 2019. "To Infinity and Beyond: A General Framework for Scaling Economic Theories," Papers 1906.10333, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aoz:wpaper:274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laura Inés D Amato (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/redniar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.