IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/56628.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Post-Buyout Experience: Peanut and Tobacco Sectors Adapt to Policy Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Dohlman, Erik
  • Foreman, Linda F.
  • Da Pra, Michelle

Abstract

Marketing quota and price support programs for peanuts and tobacco were a longstanding feature of U.S. farm policy, from the 1930s until the Government enacted quota buyouts, in 2002 for peanuts and 2004 for tobacco. Quota owners were compensated with temporary payments, but elimination of the quota programs exposed producers more to market risks and brought about structural changes at farm, regional, and marketwide levels. Since the buyouts, many peanut and tobacco farms have exited production. The farms that remain are mostly larger and have adopted new risk management strategies, such as contracting. Freed of the planting restrictions in the quota programs, production of peanuts, and to a lesser extent of tobacco, has been relocated to regions better suited to their growth. While total acreage and prices for peanuts and tobacco have remained below pre-buyout levels, the lower prices—along with increased production efficiency— have supported renewed growth in demand, particularly in export markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2009. "The Post-Buyout Experience: Peanut and Tobacco Sectors Adapt to Policy Reform," Economic Information Bulletin 56628, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:56628
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.56628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/56628/files/EIB-60.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.56628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rucker, Randal R & Thurman, Walter N & Sumner, Daniel A, 1995. "Restricting the Market for Quota: An Analysis of Tobacco Production Rights with Corroboration from Congressional Testimony," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(1), pages 142-175, February.
    2. A. Blake Brown & Randal R. Rucker & Walter N. Thurman, 2007. "The End of the Federal Tobacco Program: Economic Impacts of the Deregulation of U.S. Tobacco Production," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 635-655.
    3. MacDonald, James M. & Korb, Penelope J., 2008. "Producers Rely on Contracts To Manage Increased Price Risks," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pages 1-1, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2018. "An Analysis of Price Behavior in the United States Peanut Industry," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266537, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2010. "Post-Buyout Structural Change in the Peanut and Tobacco Sectors," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56355, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    3. Bolotova, Yulia V., 2023. "Market Power in the U.S. Dairy Industry," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(2), March.
    4. MacDonald, James M., 2011. "Why Are Farms Getting Larger? The Case Of The U.S," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 115361, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Foreman, Linda F. & McBride, William D., 2011. "Policy Reform in the Tobacco Industry: Producers Adapt to a Changing Market," Economic Information Bulletin 117969, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889.
    7. MacDonald, James M. & Korb, Penni & Hoppe, Robert A., 2013. "Farm Size and the Organization of U.S. Crop Farming," Economic Research Report 262221, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Schmitz Andrew & Haynes Dwayne J. & Schmitz Troy G., 2013. "Benefit-cost analysis: government compensation vs. consumer tax model," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 375-389, December.
    9. Bolotova, Yuliya V. & Smith, Nathan B., 2017. "An Analysis of the South Carolina Peanut Industry," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252966, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    10. Bolotova, Yuliya V., 2022. "Price-Fixing in the U.S. Broiler Chicken and Pork Industries," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 4(4), September.
    11. Schmitz Andrew & Schmitz Troy G., 2010. "Benefit-Cost Analysis: Distributional Considerations under Producer Quota Buyouts," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-15, July.
    12. MacDonald, James M. & Korb, Penelope J., 2011. "Agricultural Contracting Update: Contracts in 2008," Economic Information Bulletin 101279, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Schmitz & Dwayne J. Haynes & Troy G. Schmitz, 2016. "Alternative Approaches to Compensation and Producer Rights," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(3), pages 439-454, September.
    2. Just, David R. & Kropp, Jaclyn D., 2009. "Production Incentives from Static Decoupling: Entry, Exit and Use Exclusion Restrictions," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49158, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Dohlman, Erik & Foreman, Linda F. & Da Pra, Michelle, 2010. "Post-Buyout Structural Change in the Peanut and Tobacco Sectors," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56355, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2010. "EU Land Markets and the Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 53(3), pages 1-31.
    5. Squires, Dale, 2016. "Firm behavior under quantity controls: The theory of virtual quantities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 70-86.
    6. Haynes, Dwayne J. & Schmitz, Andrew & Schmitz, Troy G., 2015. "Producer Compensation under Government Programs: What Should the Magnitude Be?," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196887, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Frederic Chantreuil & J. Mathurin, 1997. "Implementation of a production control program within the EU : a cooperative games approach," Working Papers hal-01593978, HAL.
    8. Sullivan, Sarah & Glantz, Stanton, 2010. "The changing role of agriculture in tobacco control policymaking: A South Carolina case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1527-1534, October.
    9. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jo Swinnen, 2008. "Static and Dynamic Distributional Effects of Decoupled Payments," Journal of Economics and Econometrics, Economics and Econometrics Society, vol. 51(2), pages 20-47.
    10. Nancy H. Chau & Harry de Gorter, 2005. "Disentangling the Consequences of Direct Payment Schemes in Agriculture on Fixed Costs, Exit Decisions, and Output," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1174-1181.
    11. Brown, A. Blake & Snell, William M. & Tiller, Kelly, 1999. "The Changing Political Environment For Tobacco -- Implications For Southern Tobacco Farmers, Rural Economies, Taxpayers, And Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-18, August.
    12. Corbett A. Grainger & Christopher Costello, 2016. "Distributional Effects of the Transition to Property Rights for a Common-Pool Resource," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(1), pages 1-26.
    13. Wilson, Norbert L.W. & Sumner, Daniel A. & Havenner, Arthur M., 1997. "Time Series Analysis of a Policy-Created Asset: The Case of the California Dairy Quota," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35926, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Brown, A. Blake & Martin, Laura L., 1996. "Price Versus Quota Reductions: U.S. Flue-Cured Tobacco Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-8, December.
    15. Skully, David W., 1999. "The Economics Of Trq Administration," Working Papers 14584, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    16. Skully, David W., 2001. "Economics of Tariff-Rate Quota Administration," Technical Bulletins 184332, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Peckham, Janet G. & Kropp, Jaclyn D., 2012. "Decoupled Direct Payments under Base Acreage and Yield Updating Uncertainty: An Investigation of Agricultural Chemical Use," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Sumner, Daniel A., 1995. "Farm Programs And Related Policy In The United States," Proceedings of the 1st Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1995: Understanding Canada\United States Grain Disputes 16742, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    19. Skully, David W., 2000. "U.S. Trqs For Peanuts, Sugar, And Tobacco: Historical Allocation And Nondiscrimination," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 1-10, April.
    20. Grafton, R Quentin & Squires, Dale & Fox, Kevin J, 2000. "Private Property and Economic Efficiency: A Study of a Common-Pool Resource," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 679-713, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Industrial Organization; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:56628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.