IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/midasp/11542.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ex-Ante Assessment Of The Impact Of Disease-Resistant Cucurbits Germplasm In Indonesia And South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Mather, David
  • Bernsten, Richard H.
  • Maredia, Mywish K.

Abstract

This report presents a summary of the results of an ex-ante socioeconomic assessment of the potential impacts of the improved cucurbits germplasm in Indonesia and South Africa. The cucurbits technology was developed by Cornell University through support from the USAID-funded Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP). The objectives of these assessments were to: a) investigate the current status of the cucurbits subsector in Indonesia and South Africa; b) evaluate and quantify potential/projected benefits and costs of the cucurbits technology to seed companies, producers, and consumers in Indonesia and South Africa; and c) identify key issues that ABSP researchers, the ABSP management team, and USAID need to take into account in the development and transfer of technology to developing countries in order to fully reap the potential benefits and minimize costs. This study provides several key insights with respect to the characteristics of the cucurbit subsector in Indonesia and South Africa, the performance of Cornell's disease-resistant germplasm in recent in-country field trials, the potential farm- and market-level economic impact of this germplasm, institutional lessons, and opportunities to increase the impact of Cornell's collaboration with seed firms in these countries. Preliminary field tests of the Cornell materials demonstrate that their sources of resistance appear to be valuable in the growing environments of Indonesia and South Africa. Analysis of the farm-level benefits of disease-resistant cucurbits show that adopting farmers in both countries would likely pay higher input costs, but would enjoy higher net revenues. Using assumed adoption rates-based upon subsector analysis of each cucurbit-the farm-level benefits are aggregated to the market level using a standard economic surplus model. These aggregate benefits are then compared in a benefit-cost framework with past and (assumed) future investment costs borne by ABSP and private sector seed companies in the development of these varieties. Under the baseline scenario, the internal rate of return to ABSP's investment in Indonesia and South Africa is 46.5% and the net present value (discounted net social gains) is US$47.3 million. The collaborating seed companies in Indonesia and South Africa could potentially increase their gross revenues by US$4.5 million, as a result of incorporating disease-resistance into their future cucurbit varieties. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that when using 50% of the baseline adoption rates and 50% of the baseline farm-level expected yield gain from disease-resistant cucurbit varieties, the rate of return is still favorable at 27.1% and the net present value is US$6.9 million. With respect to poverty alleviation, the distribution of benefits and labor generation in Indonesia is ideal, as cucumber is produced by small-scale farmers throughout the country and consumed by all Indonesians. Although melon is produced by small-scale yet higher-resource farmers, it is consumed primarily by higher-income Indonesians. By contrast, the distribution of benefits in South Africa is less than ideal, as zucchini, cucumber, and melon are produced by large-scale (white) farmers and consumed by high-income whites. While these crops do generate labor for black women, they are not traditionally grown by small-scale (black) farmers. Furthermore, the constraints that small-scale (black) farmers face in producing these high-value crops cannot be alleviated solely through varietal improvement. An exception to this is butternut, which is grown by both white and black farmers and is consumed by all South Africans. Keys to increasing future ABSP impact in cucurbits include: performing socioeconomic assessment of cucurbit subsectors in target countries to help set collaborative breeding priorities; encouraging Cornell to collaborate with several firms in each country (in order to avoid monopoly pricing of new technologies), and, in South Africa, working with cucurbits that small-scale farmers traditionally produce and consume-primarily pumpkins.

Suggested Citation

  • Mather, David & Bernsten, Richard H. & Maredia, Mywish K., 2002. "Ex-Ante Assessment Of The Impact Of Disease-Resistant Cucurbits Germplasm In Indonesia And South Africa," Staff Paper Series 11542, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11542
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.11542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/11542/files/sp02-28.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.11542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holtzman, John S., 1986. "Rapid Reconnaissance Guidelines for Agricultural Marketing and Food System Research in Developing Countries," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54741, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    2. James Duncan Shaffer, 1973. "On the Concept of Subsector Studies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(2), pages 333-335.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Clevenger, 1989. "A critique of the rapid market assessment of new products: A comment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(1), pages 61-64.
    2. Boughton, Duncan & Staatz, John M. & Shaffer, James D., 1994. "Analyzing the Impact of Structural Adjustment on Commodity Subsectors: Currency Devaluation and the Maize Subsector in Mali," Staff Paper Series 201195, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    3. Nagarajan, Geetha & Meyer, Richard L., 1995. "Incorporating finance into a modified subsector framework: The fertilizer subsector in The Gambia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(7), pages 1115-1127, July.
    4. Boughton, Duncan & Staatz, John M. & Shaffer, James D., 1994. "From Pilot Study to Commodity Subsector Economics Program: Institutionalizing a Market-Oriented Approach to Agricultural Research in Mali," Staff Paper Series 201196, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    5. Riley, Harold M., 1987. "Seminar on Food Marketing Policy in China: Vertical Coordination of Food Systems and Commodity Sub-Systems," Staff Paper Series 200933, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    6. Jallat, Frédéric & Shultz, Clifford J., 2011. "Lebanon: From cataclysm to opportunityâCrisis management lessons for MNCs in the tourism sector of the Middle East," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 476-486, October.
    7. Woods, Timothy A. & Sterns, James A. & Ricks, Donald J. & Bitsky, Randy, 1998. "Strategic Planning Approaches and Concepts: Potentials for Improving Commodity Subsector Performance," Staff Papers 37869, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    8. Tschirley, David L. & del Castillo, Anne Marie, 2007. "Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement: An Assessment of Experience in Africa and Elements of Good Donor Practice," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54562, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Eric S. Belsky & Gerald J. Karaska, 1992. "Toward Effective Regional and Location Planning for Rural and Urban Linkages: The Debate Joined," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 15(3), pages 341-343, December.
    10. Janssen, Willem & Goldsworthy, Peter, 1996. "Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: Conceptual and practical implications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 259-279, July.
    11. Farrelly, Laura L., 1996. "Transforming Poultry Production and Marketing in Developing Countries: Lessons Learned with Implications for Sub-Saharan Africa," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54687, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Ruhangawebare, Godfrey Kalemera, 2010. "Factors Affecting The Level Of Commercialization Among Cattle Keepers In The Pastoral Areas Of Uganda," Research Theses 117797, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    13. Staatz, John M. & Bernsten, Richard H., 1992. "Technology Development and Household Food Security," Staff Paper Series 201154, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    14. Tschirley, David L. & del Castillo, Anne Marie, 2007. "Local and Regional Food Aid Procurement: An Assessment of Experience in Africa and Elements of Good Donor Practice," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 54486, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    15. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Tambi, E & Mullins, G, 1997. "A research methodology for characterizing dairy marketing systems," Research Reports 182903, International Livestock Research Institute.
    16. Guillaume ASSOGBA & Samuel KLEBANER, 2015. "Vers un cadre d’analyse institutionnaliste de la politique de filière : Quelle cohérence pour la politique de filière française ?," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2015-26, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    17. Weber, Michael T., 1996. "Food Security II Cooperative Agreement: Project Fact Sheets (1995/96 version)," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54696, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    18. Mather, David & Donovan, Cynthia & Jayne, Thomas S. & Weber, Michael T. & Chapoto, Antony & Mazhangara, Edward & Mghenyi, Elliot W. & Bailey, Linda & Yoo, Kyeongwon & Yamano, Takashi, 2004. "A Cross-Country Analysis of Household Response to Adult Mortality in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for HIV/AIDS Mitigation and Rural Development Policies," Food Security International Development Policy Syntheses 11322, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    19. O'Brien-Place, Patricia & Frankenberger, Timothy R., 1988. "Food Availability and Consumption Indicators," USDA Miscellaneous 337150, United States Department of Agriculture.
    20. Traub, Lulama Ndibongo & Jayne, Thomas S., 2004. "The Effects of Market Reform on Maize Marketing Margins in South Africa," Food Security International Development Working Papers 54570, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:midasp:11542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/damsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.