IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi07/6614.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic Capabilities in the Food Industry? - On the Applicability of the Evolutionary Orientated Resource Based View of Firm

Author

Listed:
  • Voigt, Tim
  • Kuhl, Rainer

Abstract

An important indicator or even the crucial factor of the competitiveness of a company can be seen in its innovative capacity, i.e. the abstract capacity to launch continuous product innovations and to implement the required processes in the internal structure of an organization. This is also true for the food industry as several studies of the broad area of innovations in the food market have shown (Galizzi/Venturini, 1996). From a more macroeconomic perspective, the national innovation systems have been analyzed, as well as general trends in the food sector (Menrad, 2001). In the empirical literature we find several surveys analyzing the influence of the innovative performance of firms in the food industry (Herrmann et al., 1996; McNamara et al., 2003). Most of these contributions concentrate either on statements on the Input-Output Relationship of innovation activities or include analysis within the Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm provided by the scholars of the Harvard School. Both aspects are starting points for empirical research as well as in both cases the process-related and dynamic elements of innovation are treated as a black box. The general intention of this paper is to find a more theoretical framework which explains the innovative capacity of firms that are involved in the focused sector. In this regard the concept of Dynamic Capabilities provided by Teece et al. (1997) and Eisenhardt/Martin (2000) are broadly accepted as a useable explanation of firms' innovative capacity. Since these concepts were designed with a particular regard to typical high-tech industries like IT-branch, telecommunication and biotechnology, the question comes up if these approaches do essentially fit to those conditions we can observe on the food market. Thus, the purpose of this paper is twofold: first, we want to introduce and discuss the concepts of dynamic capabilities in the context of firms' innovative capacity and market dynamics. Second, we are going to analyse the explanatory power and finally the applicability of dynamic capabilities to the food industry. We will start with an introduction and critical discussions of the concepts of Dynamic Capabilities (II) that are regarded as the recent extension on RBV. In order to test the applicability of Dynamic Capabilities to the food market, we concentrate the analysis on three main criteria (III) derived from the theoretical background. Based on those, we will finally draw a conclusion (IV) on the applicability of the approach discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Voigt, Tim & Kuhl, Rainer, 2007. "Dynamic Capabilities in the Food Industry? - On the Applicability of the Evolutionary Orientated Resource Based View of Firm," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6614, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi07:6614
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.6614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6614/files/sp08vo01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.6614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott L. Newbert, 2007. "Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 121-146, February.
    2. David J. TEECE, 2008. "Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 5, pages 67-87, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    3. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    4. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    5. Michael Song & Cornelia Droge & Sangphet Hanvanich & Roger Calantone, 2005. "Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 259-276, March.
    6. Helfat, C.E. & Raubitschek, R.S., 2000. "Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products," Papers 00-1, U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division.
    7. Kevin T. Mcnamara & Christoph R. Weiss & Antje Wittkopp, 2004. "Market Success Of Premium Product Innovation: Empirical Evidence From The German Food Sector," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: George Baourakis (ed.), Marketing Trends For Organic Food In The 21st Century, chapter 8, pages 127-140, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Menrad, Klaus, 2001. "Innovations at the Borderline of Food, Nutrition and Health in Germany - A Systems' Theory Approach," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(06), pages 1-11.
    9. Vincent Mangematin & Nadine Mandran, 2002. "Do Non-R&D Intensive Industries Benefit from Public Research Spillovers? The Case of the Agro-Food Industry," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Alfred Kleinknecht & Pierre Mohnen (ed.), Innovation and Firm Performance, chapter 8, pages 175-200, Palgrave Macmillan.
    10. Vincent Mangematin & Nadine Mandran, 2001. ""Do non-R&D intensive industries benefit of spillovers from public research? The case of the Agro-food industry," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-00424286, HAL.
    11. Foss, Nicolai J., 1998. "The resource-based perspective: An assessment and diagnosis of problems," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 133-149, March.
    12. Iain Cockburn & Rebecca Henderson, 1997. "Public-Private Interaction and the Productivity of Pharmaceutical Research," NBER Working Papers 6018, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Peter J. Lane & Jane E. Salk & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2001. "Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(12), pages 1139-1161, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Voigt, Tim & Kuhl, Rainer, 2008. "Competencies of Reconfiguration in Product Development – The Case of Convenience Food," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49880, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoming He & Yaqun Yi & Zelong Wei, 2019. "New product development capabilities in China: the moderating role of TMT cooperative behavior," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 73-97, April.
    2. Fang, Yulin & Wade, Michael & Delios, Andrew & Beamish, Paul W., 2013. "An exploration of multinational enterprise knowledge resources and foreign subsidiary performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 30-38.
    3. Judith Cavazos-Arroyo & Rogelio Puente-Diaz, 2019. "The Influence of Marketing Capability in Mexican Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Haili Zhang & Yufan Wang & Michael Song, 2019. "Does Competitive Intensity Moderate the Relationships between Sustainable Capabilities and Sustainable Organizational Performance in New Ventures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Andrew A. King & Christopher L. Tucci, 2002. "Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 171-186, February.
    6. Kotabe, Masaaki & Jiang, Crystal Xiangwen & Murray, Janet Y., 2011. "Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 166-176, April.
    7. Sok, Phyra & O’Cass, Aron & Sok, Keo Mony, 2013. "Achieving superior SME performance: Overarching role of marketing, innovation, and learning capabilities," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 161-167.
    8. Lawton, Thomas & Rajwani, Tazeeb & Doh, Jonathan, 2013. "The antecedents of political capabilities: A study of ownership, cross-border activity and organization at legacy airlines in a deregulatory context," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 228-242.
    9. Voigt, Tim & Kuhl, Rainer, 2008. "Competencies of Reconfiguration in Product Development – The Case of Convenience Food," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49880, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Cristina Fernandes & João J. Ferreira & Mário L. Raposo & Cristina Estevão & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2017. "The dynamic capabilities perspective of strategic management: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 529-555, July.
    11. Hui Feng & Neil A. Morgan & Lopo L. Rego, 2017. "Firm capabilities and growth: the moderating role of market conditions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 76-92, January.
    12. Guido Bortoluzzi & Saif Maqbool, 2016. "Le dodici fonti della capacit? innovativa tra letteratura accademica e pratica manageriale," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(3), pages 48-67.
    13. Lewandowska Małgorzata Stefania, 2015. "Capturing Absorptive Capacity: Concepts, Determinants, Measurement Modes and Role in Open Innovation," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 45(1), pages 32-56, March.
    14. Branzei, Oana & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2006. "Strategic pathways to product innovation capabilities in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 75-105, January.
    15. Toshiro Wakayama & Karen LaPierre, 2015. "Dynamic Capabilities In The Presence Of A Strategic Paradox," Working Papers EMS_2015_01, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    16. Alar Kolk & Kristi P¸¸mann, 2008. "Co-Development of Open Innovation Strategy and Dynamic Capabilities as a Source of Corporate Growth," Working Papers 173, Tallinn School of Economics and Business Administration, Tallinn University of Technology.
    17. Voola, Ranjit & Casimir, Gian & Carlson, Jamie & Anushree Agnihotri, M., 2012. "The effects of market orientation, technological opportunism, and e-business adoption on performance: A moderated mediation analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 136-146.
    18. Wu Zhan & Roger (Rongxin) Chen, 2013. "Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 601-632, June.
    19. Philipp N. Baecker, 2007. "Real Options and Intellectual Property," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-48264-2, October.
    20. Wang, Taiyuan & Thornhill, Stewart, 2010. "R&D investment and financing choices: A comprehensive perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 1148-1159, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi07:6614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.