IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea91/271081.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Textile Trade Liberalization And The U.S. Cotton Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Shui, Shangnan
  • Beghin, John C.

Abstract

This study investigates impacts on the U.S. cotton industry of textile trade liberalization using a multi-market equilibrium displacement model. Textile trade liberalization would induce small chang~s in the total demand for U.S. cotton but would affect considerably U.S. cotton demand structure, making U.S. cotton growers more dependent on world markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Shui, Shangnan & Beghin, John C., 1991. "Textile Trade Liberalization And The U.S. Cotton Industry," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271081, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea91:271081
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.271081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271081/files/aaea-1991-015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271081/files/aaea-1991-015.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.271081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trela, Irene & Whalley, John, 1990. "Global Effects of Developed Country Trade Restrictions on Textiles and Apparel," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(403), pages 1190-1205, December.
    2. Duffy, Patricia A. & Richardson, James W. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1987. "Regional Cotton Acreage Response," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shui, Shangnan & Wohlgenant, Michael K. & Beghin, John C., 1993. "Policy Implications of Textile Trade Management and the U.S. Cotton Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 37-47, April.
    2. Carlson, Gerald A. & Sappie, Glen & Hammig, Michael, 1989. "Economic Returns to Boll Weevil Eradication," Agricultural Economic Reports 308080, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Rehbein, Kathleen & Starks, Laura T., 1995. "Changes in U.S. trade policies: the wealth effects on Japanese steel firms," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 309-327, September.
    4. Elena Ianchovichina & Maros Ivanic, 2016. "Economic Effects of the Syrian War and the Spread of the Islamic State on the Levant," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 1584-1627, October.
    5. Kenneth A. Reinert, 1993. "Textile and Apparel Protection in the United States: A General Equilibrium Analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 359-376, May.
    6. Afia Malik, 2000. "Demand for Textile and Clothing Exports of Pakistan," PIDE Research Report 2000:4, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    7. Kar, Saibal & Kar, Mausumi, 2010. "The multi fibre arrangement and South Asia," MPRA Paper 103801, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ramos Mabugu & Margaret Chitiga, 2009. "Liberalising Trade In South Africa: A Survey Of Computable General Equilibrium Studies," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 77(3), pages 445-464, September.
    9. Cooke, Stephen C. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1991. "Measuring And Explaining The Decline In U.S. Cotton Productivity Growth," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16, July.
    10. repec:pru:wpaper:9 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Krishna, Kala & Martin, Will & Tan, Ling Hui, 1997. "Imputing license prices: limitations of a cost-based approach," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 355-374, April.
    12. Verikios, George, 2009. "Modelling the world wool market: A hybrid approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 418-431, March.
    13. George Verikios, 2006. "Understanding the World Wool Market: Trade, Productivity and Grower Incomes. Part 1: Introduction," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    14. Bruce C. Brown, 2001. "Wages And Employment In The U.S. Apparel Industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 19(4), pages 454-464, October.
    15. Parrott, Scott D. & McIntosh, Christopher S., 1996. "Nonconstant Price Expectations And Acreage Response: The Case Of Cotton Production In Georgia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-8, July.
    16. Riccardo Faini & Jaime Melo & Wendy Takacs, 1995. "A Primer on the MFA Maze," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 113-135, January.
    17. Kenneth Hanson & Kenneth Reinert, 1997. "The Distributional Effects of U.S. Textile and Apparel Protection," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12.
    18. Duffy, Patricia A. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1991. "Effects Of An Export Subsidy On The U.S. Cotton Industry," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-7, December.
    19. Ahouissoussi, Nicolas B.C. & McIntosh, Christopher S. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 1995. "Rational Expectations Estimation Of Georgia Soybean Acreage Response," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Joyce Hall Krause & B. Wade Brorsen, 1995. "The Effect of Risk on the Rental Value of Agricultural Land," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 71-76.
    21. Roberto A. De Santis, 2003. "Why exporting countries agree to voluntary export restraints: the oligopolistic power of the foreign supplier," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 50(3), pages 247-263, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; International Relations/Trade;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea91:271081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.