IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sptchp/978-981-97-1382-0_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Reconstruction of the Theory of Production and Preference

In: Evolutionary Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Yuji Aruka

Abstract

This article was originally designed to comment an unprecedented bibliometric study of evolutionary economics by HodgsonHodgson, G.M. and Lamberg (2016). However, Hodgson only reported the historical trajectory and the current situations of evolutionary economics initiated by since Nelson RR Winter SG Nelson and Winter (1982). He gave an insightful consideration about the raison d’être of evolutionary economicsEvolutionary economics. According to his opinion, evolutionary economics is still failing to equip the core theoriesCore theories. We naturally agree with his remarks on the current situations around evolutionary economics. We take this opportunity to squarely address the subject about how to insert the core theories into evolutionary economics. We argue that the alternative candidates to be replaced with the main stream core theories are in the following ordering:(1) the theory of production to invalidate myopic optimizationMyopic optimization, (2) the theory of preference to invalidate myopic optimization, (3) the SMD Theorem to invalidate invisible handInvisible hand, and (4) the market mechanism to invalidate the efficient market hypothesisEfficient market hypothesis. Needless to say, the alternative theories shown in these arguments imply the reconstruction of economics. Finally, we address the current analysis of bibliometrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuji Aruka, 2024. "The Reconstruction of the Theory of Production and Preference," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Evolutionary Economics, chapter 0, pages 137-160, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-981-97-1382-0_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-1382-0_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sptchp:978-981-97-1382-0_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.