IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/recchp/978-3-031-52015-0_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Role of Communities of Practice in the Operationalization of Relational Learning in Organizations

In: Organizational Learning as Relational Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Geraldo Schwengber

    (Zeppelin University)

Abstract

This chapter introduces the concept of communities of practice (CoPs) as a locus of organizational learning. First, the concept of CoPs is discussed in detail, both its conceptualization in organizational theory and empirical studies of CoPs in organizations. These discussions aim to highlight the conceptual similarities with the transcultural learning model (TLM) discussed in the previous chapter (these similarities include a focus on what connects the parts in a learning process and a call to focus on learning beyond the intra-organizational context), as well as some conceptual changes for the application of CoPs for operationalizing relational learning as a relational governance. The conceptual changes primarily concern the nature of the organization. While in the CoP literature the organization is a constellation of practices, here the organization is conceptualized as a nexus of stakeholder resources and interests. CoPs can contribute to the operationalization of organizational learning as relational governance insofar as they provide the locus for relationalizing multiple rationalities of stakeholders investing resources and interests in organizational transactions. These elaborations lay the foundations for the integration of CoPs into the TLM: the complete model for operationalizing organizational learning as conceived in this book. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the assessment of the success of organizational learning. Using the firm as an example, the difference between the relational costs of implementing organizational learning as relational governance and the cooperation rents generated by learning processes is used as a variable. Both variables, especially cooperation rents, involve intangibles that make them difficult to measure with traditional accounting tools. Qualitative metrics, such as story-telling, and additional accounting mechanisms, such as the shared value statement, are discussed as possible methods for measuring the variables and thus assessing organizational learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Geraldo Schwengber, 2024. "The Role of Communities of Practice in the Operationalization of Relational Learning in Organizations," Relational Economics and Organization Governance, in: Organizational Learning as Relational Governance, chapter 0, pages 81-109, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:recchp:978-3-031-52015-0_7
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52015-0_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:recchp:978-3-031-52015-0_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.