IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v17y2019i2-bp368-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Process Management and Corporate Performance Management: Does Their Alignment Impact Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Dalia Suša Vugec

    (University of Zagreb - Faculty of Economics & Business, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Lucija Ivancic

    (University of Zagreb - Faculty of Economics & Business, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Ljubica Milanovic Glavan

    (University of Zagreb - Faculty of Economics & Business, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Both business process management (BPM) and corporate performance management (CPM) are receiving much attention in academic circles, as well as in business practice. One of the main reasons behind their adoption within organizations is enhancing overall organizational performance (OP). Therefore, this article aims to explore the link between BPM and CPM and how their maturities affect their alignment. Moreover, the article deals with the impact of BPM-CPM alignment to OP. Although there are some studies dealing with empirical confirmation that either BPM or CPM increases OP, to the best of authors' knowledge, none of the studies tries to investigate their combined impact in terms of an alignment empirically. Hence, this article focuses on shedding some light on the importance of BPM-CPM alignment and its connection to OP. A survey has been conducted in medium sized and large organizations operating in Slovenia and Croatia resulting in a total of 159 answers. Observed organizations have been segmented in two clusters, using k-means algorithm: low-performers and high-performers, revealing statistically significant differences between them for all observed variables. Results also indicate that the BPM-CPM alignment increases when both BPM and CPM maturities are higher. Furthermore, OP of the observed organizations has been examined through named two clusters. The Mann-Whitney U test revealed there are statistically significant differences between OP variables among low-performers and high-performance clusters, indicating the relationship of BPM-CPM alignment with OP.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalia Suša Vugec & Lucija Ivancic & Ljubica Milanovic Glavan, 2019. "Business Process Management and Corporate Performance Management: Does Their Alignment Impact Organizational Performance," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 17(2-B), pages 368-384.
    • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:17:y:2019:i:2-b:p:368-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://indecs.eu/2019/indecs2019-pp368-384.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marko Sarstedt & Erik Mooi, 2014. "The Market Research Process," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: A Concise Guide to Market Research, edition 2, chapter 2, pages 11-23, Springer.
    2. Gordon E Greenley & Mehmet Oktemgil, 1998. "A Comparison of Slack Resources in High and Low Performing British Companies," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 377-398, May.
    3. Saba Moradi & Farimah Mokhatab Rafiei, 2019. "A dynamic credit risk assessment model with data mining techniques: evidence from Iranian banks," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Martin Reisenbichler & Thomas Reutterer, 2019. "Topic modeling in marketing: recent advances and research opportunities," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 327-356, April.
    5. Marko Sarstedt & Erik Mooi, 2014. "A Concise Guide to Market Research," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-642-53965-7, September.
    6. Rajenlall Siriram, 2012. "A Soft and Hard Systems Approach to Business Process Management," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 87-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alaa M. Ubaid & Fikri T. Dweiri, 2020. "Business process management (BPM): terminologies and methodologies unified," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1046-1064, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meldrick Arjay A. Magsino & Reynold S. Beredo & Arex A. Anza, 2014. "The Motivational Effects of LPU Awards of Excellence: Basis for Improvement," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(12), pages 371-397, December.
    2. Marc Dressler & Ivan Paunovic, 2021. "Not All Wine Businesses Are the Same: Examining the Impact of Winery Business Model Extensions on the Size of Its Core Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Laura-Gabriela CONSTANTIN, 2014. "Catastrophe Bonds. From Structure to Strategy – A Cluster Analysis at European Level," Economia. Seria Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 304-317, December.
    4. Schlägel, Christopher & Sarstedt, Marko, 2016. "Assessing the measurement invariance of the four-dimensional cultural intelligence scale across countries: A composite model approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 633-649.
    5. Tae Kyung Yoon & SoEun Ahn, 2020. "Clustering Koreans’ Environmental Awareness and Attitudes into Seven Groups: Environmentalists, Dissatisfieds, Inactivators, Bystanders, Honeybees, Optimists, and Moderates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Cheng, John W. & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2016. "Effects of ICT and media information on collective resilience after disasters – from a virtual crowd to a psychological crowd – Part 1 - ICT and media information and collective resilience in an emerg," 27th European Regional ITS Conference, Cambridge (UK) 2016 148663, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Ali, Fazilatulaili & Dissanayake, Dilum & Bell, Margaret & Farrow, Malcolm, 2018. "Investigating car users' attitudes to climate change using multiple correspondence analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 237-247.
    8. Yelena Popova & Sergejs Popovs, 2022. "Impact of Smart Economy on Smart Areas and Mediation Effect of National Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Muhammad A. Saleem & Hina Ismail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Actions Speak Louder than Words: Investigating the Interplay between Descriptive and Injunctive Norms to Promote Alternative Fuel Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Todorović Jadranka Đurović & Đorđević Marina & Krstić Marko, 2020. "The Impact of Corporate Income Tax on Gross Domestic Product - The Case of the Republic of Serbia," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 58(3), pages 311-326, September.
    11. Marc Dressler & Ivan Paunovic, 2021. "A Typology of Winery SME Brand Strategies with Implications for Sustainability Communication and Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Doina Popescu & Olguta Anca Orzan, 2020. "Eco-innovation Capability and Sustainability Driven Innovation Practices in Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Nitzl, Christian, 2016. "The use of partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in management accounting research: Directions for future theory development," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 19-35.
    14. Mirjana Pejić Bach & Tine Bertoncel & Maja Meško & Dalia Suša Vugec & Lucija Ivančić, 2020. "Big Data Usage in European Countries: Cluster Analysis Approach," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Amal Elasri-Ejjaberi & Pilar Aparicio-Chueca & Xavier M. Triadó-Ivern, 2020. "An Analysis of the Determinants of Sport Expenditure in Sports Centers in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Jaewoo Choi & Woonsun Kang, 2019. "Sustainability of Cooperative Professional Development: Focused on Teachers’ Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Marianna Alesi & Giulia Giordano & Ambra Gentile & Barbara Caci, 2023. "The Switch to Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Interplay between Personality and Mental Health on University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Ng, Wei Keat Benny & Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Cloodt, Myriam & Arentze, Theo, 2021. "Perceptual measures of science parks: Tenant firms’ associations between science park attributes and benefits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Joyce Wanjiku Nderitu & Esther Waiganjo & George O. Orwa, 2020. "Investigating the effect of organizational culture on strategy implementation process of private chartered universities in Kenya Key Words: organizational culture, clan culture, strategy, implementati," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Helder Sequeiros & Tiago Oliveira & Manoj A. Thomas, 2022. "The Impact of IoT Smart Home Services on Psychological Well-Being," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1009-1026, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    business process management; business process orientation; corporate performance management; organizational performance; BPM-CPM alignment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:17:y:2019:i:2-b:p:368-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.