IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/235601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Институциональные Факторы Политического Доверия В Современной России
[Institutional Factors Influencing Political Trust in Modern Russia]

Author

Listed:
  • Malkina, Marina Yu.
  • Ovchinnikov, Vyacheslav N.
  • Kholodilin, Konstantin A.

Abstract

Цель настоящего исследования – анализ и количественное оценивание влияния институциональных факторов на политическое доверие различным уровням власти (федеральной, региональной и местной) в современной России. Данные и методы. Исследование основано на микроданных опроса Европейского банка реконструкции и развития (ЕБРР) «Мониторинг уровня жизни домохозяйств/индивидов в развитых, переходных и развивающихся странах» (LiTS – Life in Transition Survey). В качестве институциональных факторов доверия нами рассматривались воспринимаемая эффективность и коррупционность органов власти, а также уровень межличностного доверия. Дополнительной объясняющей переменной стал субъективный дециль богатства домохозяйств. Для оценивания параметров модели использовались линейные регрессии с инструментальными переменными. Результаты и их применение. Во-первых, нами было установлено, что в 2016 году главной детерминантой доверия российских граждан президенту была воспринимаемая эффективность действий федерального правительства. В то же время главным фактором (не)доверия российских граждан местным органам власти был воспринимаемый уровень коррупции на местах. Во-вторых, мы установили, что бедные домохозяйства оказывались наиболее лояльными по отношению к российскому президенту группами населения, и объяснили данный феномен активной перераспределительной политикой федеральных властей. В-третьих, на микроуровне мы обнаружили существенную положительную связь политического доверия с межличностным доверием. В заключение даны рекомендации относительно эффективного управления политическим доверием в современной России.

Suggested Citation

  • Malkina, Marina Yu. & Ovchinnikov, Vyacheslav N. & Kholodilin, Konstantin A., 2020. "Институциональные Факторы Политического Доверия В Современной России [Institutional Factors Influencing Political Trust in Modern Russia]," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 77-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:235601
    DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.4.077-093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/235601/1/malkina-2020-institutional-factors-influencing-vv.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17835/2076-6297.2020.12.4.077-093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxim Ananiev & Sergei Guriev, 2014. "The Effect of Income on Trust: the Evidence from 2009 Crisis in Russia," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/8lt2edmul9g, Sciences Po.
    2. Ching-Hsing Wang, 2016. "Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 97(2), pages 211-231, June.
    3. Derek S. Hutcheson & Bo Petersson, 2016. "Shortcut to Legitimacy: Popularity in Putin’s Russia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(7), pages 1107-1126, August.
    4. Daewoo Lee & Chae Young Chang & Hyunkang Hur, 2020. "Economic performance, income inequality and political trust: new evidence from a cross-national study of 14 Asian countries," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 66-88, June.
    5. Hasan Muhammad Baniamin, 2019. "Linking socio-economic performance, quality of governance, and trust in the civil service: does culture intercede in the perceived relationships? Evidence from and beyond Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lan," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 127-141, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Vyacheslav N. Ovchinnikov & Marina Yu. Malkina & Igor A. Moiseev, 2021. "Two Dimensions of Political Trust in Russia," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1934, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Zhorayev, Olzhas, 2020. "Determinants of Trust in Police: A Cross-National Analysis," MPRA Paper 109068, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Yann Algan & Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou & Evgenia Passari, 2017. "The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(2 (Fall)), pages 309-400.
    4. Alm James & Barreto Raul A., 2024. "Trust in Government in a Changing World: Shocks, Tax Evasion, and Economic Growth," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 439-487, January.
    5. Mäkinen, Mikko, 2021. "Does a financial crisis change a bank's exposure to risk? A difference-in-differences approach," BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2021, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    6. Yann Algan & Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou & Evgenia Passari, 2017. "The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(2 (Fall)), pages 309-400.
    7. Mohammad Reza Farzanegan & Hans Philipp Hofmann, 2021. "An Old Plug and a New Virus: Effect of Public Corruption on the Covid-19 Immunization Progress," CESifo Working Paper Series 9307, CESifo.
    8. Elena Gaber & Leonid Polishchuk & Kharis Sokolov & Denis Stukal, 2019. "Chronicles of a democracy postponed : Cultural legacy of the Russian transition," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 27(1), pages 99-137, January.
    9. Maxim Ananyev & Michael Poyker, 2019. "State Capacity and Demand for Identity: Evidence from Political Instability in Mali," Working Papers Series 97, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    10. Giulio Zanella & Marina M. Bellani, 2024. "The volatility of survey measures of culture and its consequences," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(2), pages 675-697, April.
    11. Carin Cruijsen & Jakob Haan & David-Jan Jansen, 2016. "Trust and Financial Crisis Experiences," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 577-600, June.
    12. Nicolás Ajzenman & Cevat Giray Aksoy & Sergei Guriev, 2020. "Exposure to Transit Migration, Public Attitudes and Entrepreneurship," Department of Economics Working Papers wp_gob_2020_02, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella.
    13. Luigi Guiso & Massimo Morelli & Tommaso Sonno & Helios Herrera, 2021. "The Financial Drivers of Populism in Europe," EIEF Working Papers Series 2112, Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF), revised Sep 2021.
    14. Lidwina Gundacker & Jarko Fidrmuc, 2017. "Oligarchs and social capital in Russian regions: a quantitative assessment," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 509-527, August.
    15. De Haas, Ralph & Djourelova, Milena & Nikolova, Elena, 2016. "The Great Recession and social preferences: Evidence from Ukraine," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 92-107.
    16. Golnaz Baradaran Motie & Christopher Biolsi, 2021. "County‐Level Determinants Of Social Distancing (Or Lack Thereof) During The Covid‐19 Pandemic," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(2), pages 264-279, April.
    17. Bejarano, Hernán & Gillet, Joris & Rodriguez-Lara, Ismael, 2021. "Trust and trustworthiness after negative random shocks," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Massimo Morelli & Antonio Nicolò & Paolo Roberti, 2021. "A Commitment Theory of Populism," CESifo Working Paper Series 9473, CESifo.
    19. Lissitsa, Sabina, 2021. "Effects of digital use on trust in political institutions among ethnic minority and hegemonic group – A case study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Margit Bussmann & Natalia Iost, 2024. "Presidential popularity and international crises: an assessment of the rally-‘round-the-flag effect in Russia," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 105-118, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:235601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.