IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/econso/246858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic sociology in Singapore: Meritocracy and the missing embeddedness

Author

Listed:
  • Chua, Vincent

Abstract

Singapore can be described as a "developmental state," defined by Chalmers Johnson as a state focused on economic development and which takes necessary policy actions to accomplish this objective. He writes specifically about Japan and the role of the economic agency MITI (Ministry of International Trade and Industry) in ushering in the Japanese miracle, but there are striking parallels to the four Asian tigers: South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and Hong Kong. Johnson says, "In states that were late to industrialize, the state itself led the industrialization drive, that is, it took on developmental functions" (Johnson 1982, 19). Like other Asian tigers, Singapore is known for its exceptional economic growth, and the state played a critical role in this growth. What distinguishes it from the other Asian economies, however, is the singular focus the state has placed on meritocracy to achieve it. In a study of thirty-five countries, Peter Evans and James Rauch (1999) devised a "Weberian scale" to describe the extent to which formal mechanisms and meritocratic procedures are applied to the recruitment of government officials, with special attention to the selection of public sector bureaucrats through a national examination system. They put meritocracy scores on the x-axis and correlate them with a measure of GDP to represent economic growth on the y-axis. The graph, which I reproduce here but with GDP scores updated to reflect 2019 conditions (Figure 1), shows an upward sloping line, suggesting a positive relationship between meritocracy and economic growth. Of special interest to me, Singapore is situated at the upper right-hand corner of this graph, indicating that its high levels of meritocracy play a substantial role in its exceptional economic growth. (...)

Suggested Citation

  • Chua, Vincent, 2021. "Economic sociology in Singapore: Meritocracy and the missing embeddedness," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 23(1), pages 19-22.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:246858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/246858/1/04_Chua_Econsoc_23-1_Nov2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Obukhova & George Lan, 2013. "Do Job Seekers Benefit from Contacts? A Direct Test with Contemporaneous Searches," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2204-2216, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dariel, Aurelie & Riedl, Arno & Siegenthaler, Simon, 2021. "Referral hiring and wage formation in a market with adverse selection," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 109-130.
    2. Asali, Muhammad, 2015. "Compulsory Military Service and Future Earnings: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 8892, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Hana STOJANOVÁ & Pavel TOMŠÍK, 2014. "Factors influencing employment for tertiary education graduates at the selected universities," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(8), pages 376-387.
    4. Steven Crawford & Wesley Gray & Bryan R. Johnson & Richard A. Price, 2018. "What Motivates Buy-Side Analysts to Share Recommendations Online?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2574-2589, June.
    5. Matthieu Manant & Serge Pajak & Nicolas Soulié, 2019. "Can social media lead to labor market discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 225-246, April.
    6. Rajiv Garg & Rahul Telang, 2018. "To Be or Not to Be Linked: Online Social Networks and Job Search by Unemployed Workforce," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3926-3941, August.
    7. Holger Lüdeke & Hanjo Allinger, 2017. "Zeig mir deine Freunde und ich sag dir, wer du bist – Ein empirischer Test zur Berücksichtigung der Akteursheterogenität in der Sozialkapitalforschung [Known by the company you keep – an empirical ," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-40, March.
    8. Carolina Aragao & Aida Villanueva, 2021. "How do mothers work? Kin coresidence and mothers' work in Latin America," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(30), pages 917-956.
    9. Son-Tung Le, 2022. "Networking Behavior as a Mediation in University Graduates’ HEXACO Personality Effects on Job Search Outcomes," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    10. Sidonia von Proff, 2015. "How individual characteristics and attitudes shape the job search process of graduates," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2015-02, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    11. Roxana Barbulescu, 2015. "The Strength of Many Kinds of Ties: Unpacking the Role of Social Contacts Across Stages of the Job Search Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1040-1058, August.
    12. Michael Weiler & Oliver Hinz, 2019. "Without each other, we have nothing: a state-of-the-art analysis on how to operationalize social capital," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 1003-1035, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:246858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.