IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/quante/v10y2019i3p1019-1068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation and inference with a (nearly) singular Jacobian

Author

Listed:
  • Sukjin Han
  • Adam McCloskey

Abstract

This paper develops extremum estimation and inference results for nonlinear models with very general forms of potential identification failure when the source of this identification failure is known. We examine models that may have a general deficient rank Jacobian in certain parts of the parameter space. When identification fails in one of these models, it becomes underidentified and the identification status of individual parameters is not generally straightforward to characterize. We provide a systematic reparameterization procedure that leads to a reparametrized model with straightforward identification status. Using this reparameterization, we determine the asymptotic behavior of standard extremum estimators and Wald statistics under a comprehensive class of parameter sequences characterizing the strength of identification of the model parameters, ranging from nonidentification to strong identification. Using the asymptotic results, we propose hypothesis testing methods that make use of a standard Wald statistic and data‐dependent critical values, leading to tests with correct asymptotic size regardless of identification strength and good power properties. Importantly, this allows one to directly conduct uniform inference on low‐dimensional functions of the model parameters, including one‐dimensional subvectors. The paper illustrates these results in three examples: a sample selection model, a triangular threshold crossing model, and a collective model for household expenditures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sukjin Han & Adam McCloskey, 2019. "Estimation and inference with a (nearly) singular Jacobian," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(3), pages 1019-1068, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:10:y:2019:i:3:p:1019-1068
    DOI: 10.3982/QE989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE989
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/QE989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic Data," MPRA Paper 106408, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Valérie Lechene & Krishna Pendakur & Alexander Wolf, 2020. "OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of expenditure," IFS Working Papers W20/6, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2021. "Size-corrected Bootstrap Test after Pretesting for Exogeneity with Heteroskedastic or Clustered Data," MPRA Paper 110899, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Wang, Wenjie, 2020. "Uniform Inference after Pretesting for Exogeneity," MPRA Paper 99243, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Tetsuya Kaji, 2019. "Theory of Weak Identification in Semiparametric Models," Papers 1908.10478, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    6. McCloskey, Adam, 2017. "Bonferroni-based size-correction for nonstandard testing problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 17-35.
    7. Patrik Guggenberge & Frank Kleibergen & Sophocles Mavroeidis, 2021. "A Powerful Subvector Anderson Rubin Test in Linear Instrumental Variables Regression with Conditional Heteroskedasticity," Economics Series Working Papers 960, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    8. Sukjin Han & Sungwon Lee, 2019. "Estimation in a generalization of bivariate probit models with dummy endogenous regressors," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 994-1015, September.
    9. Andrews, Donald W.K. & Cheng, Xu & Guggenberger, Patrik, 2020. "Generic results for establishing the asymptotic size of confidence sets and tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 496-531.
    10. Gregory Cox, 2018. "Almost Sure Uniqueness of a Global Minimum Without Convexity," Papers 1803.02415, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    11. Gregory Cox, 2022. "Weak Identification in Low-Dimensional Factor Models with One or Two Factors," Papers 2211.00329, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    12. Shakeeb Khan & Denis Nekipelov, 2013. "On Uniform Inference in Nonlinear Models with Endogeneity," Working Papers 13-16, Duke University, Department of Economics.
    13. Frank Kleibergen & Zhaoguo Zhan, 2021. "Double robust inference for continuous updating GMM," Papers 2105.08345, arXiv.org.
    14. Gregory Cox, 2022. "A Generalized Argmax Theorem with Applications," Papers 2209.08793, arXiv.org.
    15. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Optimal Estimation Methodologies for Panel Data Regression Models," Papers 2311.03471, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    16. Forneron, Jean-Jacques, 2024. "Detecting identification failure in moment condition models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(1).
    17. Valérie Lechene & Krishna Pendakur & Alexander Wolf, 2019. "OLS estimation of the intra-household distribution of consumption," IFS Working Papers W19/19, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Woosik Gong & Myung Hwan Seo, 2022. "Bootstraps for Dynamic Panel Threshold Models," Papers 2211.04027, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    19. Gregory Cox, 2020. "Weak Identification with Bounds in a Class of Minimum Distance Models," Papers 2012.11222, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    20. Isaiah Andrews & Anna Mikusheva, 2022. "Optimal Decision Rules for Weak GMM," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(2), pages 715-748, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:10:y:2019:i:3:p:1019-1068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.