IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/envmet/v34y2023i2ne2754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emulation of greenhouse‐gas sensitivities using variational autoencoders

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Cartwright
  • Andrew Zammit‐Mangion
  • Nicholas M. Deutscher

Abstract

Flux inversion is the process by which sources and sinks of a gas are identified from observations of gas mole fraction. The inversion often involves running a Lagrangian particle dispersion model (LPDM) to generate simulations of the gas movement over a domain of interest. The LPDM must be run backward in time for every gas measurement, and this can be computationally prohibitive. To address this problem, here we develop a novel spatio‐temporal emulator for LPDM sensitivities that is built using a convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE, a two‐piece neural network capable of condensing and reconstructing images). With the encoder segment of the CVAE, we obtain approximate (variational) posterior distributions over latent variables in a low‐dimensional space. We then use a spatio‐temporal Gaussian process emulator on the low‐dimensional space to emulate new variables at prediction locations and time points. Emulated variables are then passed through the decoder segment of the CVAE to yield emulated sensitivities. We show that our CVAE‐based emulator outperforms the more traditional emulator built using empirical orthogonal functions and that it can be used with different LPDMs. We conclude that our emulation‐based approach can be used to reliably reduce the computing time needed to generate LPDM outputs for use in high‐resolution flux inversions.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Cartwright & Andrew Zammit‐Mangion & Nicholas M. Deutscher, 2023. "Emulation of greenhouse‐gas sensitivities using variational autoencoders," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:34:y:2023:i:2:n:e2754
    DOI: 10.1002/env.2754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2754
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/env.2754?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Devin Francom & Bruno Sansó & Vera Bulaevskaya & Donald Lucas & Matthew Simpson, 2019. "Inferring Atmospheric Release Characteristics in a Large Computer Experiment Using Bayesian Adaptive Splines," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 114(528), pages 1450-1465, October.
    2. Higdon, Dave & Gattiker, James & Williams, Brian & Rightley, Maria, 2008. "Computer Model Calibration Using High-Dimensional Output," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 570-583, June.
    3. Noel Cressie, 2018. "Mission CO2ntrol: A Statistical Scientist's Role in Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(521), pages 152-168, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Aiello & Matteo Fontana & Alessandra Guglielmi, 2023. "Bayesian functional emulation of CO2 emissions on future climate change scenarios," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(8), December.
    2. Grant Hutchings & Bruno Sansó & James Gattiker & Devin Francom & Donatella Pasqualini, 2023. "Comparing emulation methods for a high‐resolution storm surge model," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), May.
    3. Drignei, Dorin, 2011. "A general statistical model for computer experiments with time series output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 460-467.
    4. Zhang, Yang & Xu, Jun & Gardoni, Paolo, 2024. "A loading contribution degree analysis-based strategy for time-variant reliability analysis of structures under multiple loading stochastic processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. White, Staci A. & Herbei, Radu, 2015. "A Monte Carlo approach to quantifying model error in Bayesian parameter estimation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 168-181.
    6. Wu, Xu & Kozlowski, Tomasz & Meidani, Hadi, 2018. "Kriging-based inverse uncertainty quantification of nuclear fuel performance code BISON fission gas release model using time series measurement data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 422-436.
    7. Paulo, Rui & García-Donato, Gonzalo & Palomo, Jesús, 2012. "Calibration of computer models with multivariate output," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3959-3974.
    8. Matthew F. Dixon & Nicholas G. Polson & Kemen Goicoechea, 2022. "Deep Partial Least Squares for Empirical Asset Pricing," Papers 2206.10014, arXiv.org.
    9. Matthew Plumlee, 2014. "Fast Prediction of Deterministic Functions Using Sparse Grid Experimental Designs," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(508), pages 1581-1591, December.
    10. Geoffrey Fairchild & Kyle S. Hickmann & Susan M. Mniszewski & Sara Y. Del Valle & James M. Hyman, 2014. "Optimizing human activity patterns using global sensitivity analysis," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 394-416, December.
    11. Daniel W. Gladish & Daniel E. Pagendam & Luk J. M. Peeters & Petra M. Kuhnert & Jai Vaze, 2018. "Emulation Engines: Choice and Quantification of Uncertainty for Complex Hydrological Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 39-62, March.
    12. Chen, Yewen & Chang, Xiaohui & Luo, Fangzhi & Huang, Hui, 2023. "Additive dynamic models for correcting numerical model outputs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Pulong Ma & Georgios Karagiannis & Bledar A. Konomi & Taylor G. Asher & Gabriel R. Toro & Andrew T. Cox, 2022. "Multifidelity computer model emulation with high‐dimensional output: An application to storm surge," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 861-883, August.
    14. Bruno Sansó & Chris Forest, 2009. "Statistical calibration of climate system properties," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 58(4), pages 485-503, September.
    15. Wilkinson Richard David, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 129-141, May.
    16. Antony M. Overstall & David C. Woods, 2013. "A Strategy for Bayesian Inference for Computationally Expensive Models with Application to the Estimation of Stem Cell Properties," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(2), pages 458-468, June.
    17. Won Chang & Murali Haran & Patrick Applegate & David Pollard, 2016. "Calibrating an Ice Sheet Model Using High-Dimensional Binary Spatial Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 57-72, March.
    18. Mohammadi, Hossein & Challenor, Peter & Goodfellow, Marc, 2019. "Emulating dynamic non-linear simulators using Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 178-196.
    19. Williams, Brian J. & Loeppky, Jason L. & Moore, Leslie M. & Macklem, Mason S., 2011. "Batch sequential design to achieve predictive maturity with calibrated computer models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1208-1219.
    20. Jung, Yongsu & Lee, Ikjin, 2021. "Optimal design of experiments for optimization-based model calibration using Fisher information matrix," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:envmet:v:34:y:2023:i:2:n:e2754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1180-4009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.