IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/notajo/v2016y2016i1p17-28n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal certainty in taxation at authorities and courts of law: a nordic view of specialization and unbiasedness

Author

Listed:
  • Tjernberg Mats

    (Professor in Public Law, Tax Law, Lund University)

Abstract

Legal certainty is central to taxation decisions. This article describes the current legal situation and discussions in four Nordic countries. Sweden and Finland are specialized in dealing with taxation cases in administrative courts. In Denmark and Norway, no specialization exists in taxation cases. I maintain in this article that legal certainty would benefit from explicit signals from the state about the requirement of special knowledge and unbiasedness in authority and court decisions. These signals could well take the form of specialization in the courts. The need for specialized expertise is particularly extensive in tax law. It is also crucial for the agencies’ officials and judges to be aware that a subjective sense of unbiasedness in decision making does not necessarily mean that the unbiasedness aimed for has been attained. Self-awareness of this kind would ensure that argumentation and grounds for decisions would be made credible and transparent, to the benefit of legal certainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Tjernberg Mats, 2016. "Legal certainty in taxation at authorities and courts of law: a nordic view of specialization and unbiasedness," Nordic Tax Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2016(1), pages 17-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:notajo:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:p:17-28:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/ntaxj-2016-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntaxj-2016-0001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ntaxj-2016-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:notajo:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:p:17-28:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.