IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tra/jlabre/v22y2001i4p817-829.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Women Earn Less Than Men in Self-Employment

Author

Listed:
  • GREG HUNDLEY

Abstract

Data from a sample of 659 self-employed individuals are used to evaluate explanations for the large earnings differential between self-employed men and women. A significant portion of the differential is attributed to differences in the industrial distribution of businesses and to the differential effects of housework and family responsibilites on the earnings of males and females. Differences due to industry position are traced to the lower proportions of women in the relatively rewarding areas of construction and professional practice and their greater representation in the relatively unrewarding personal services sector. Women in self-employment appear to be burdened by housework and childrearing in ways that limit the scope of their self-employed businesses and the intensity of work effort in them. If self-employed women were to have their total hours of labor redistributed between market work and house work in the same manner as men, their self-employed earnings would be substantially increased. A portion of the differential is traceable to differences in financial capital (female-run business have smaller capital stocks) and differences in specific human capital (female self-employed have less experience in running their business).

Suggested Citation

  • Greg Hundley, 2001. "Why Women Earn Less Than Men in Self-Employment," Journal of Labor Research, Transaction Publishers, vol. 22(4), pages 817-829, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:22:y:2001:i:4:p:817-829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=713X08965GTEC5KA
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:22:y:2001:i:4:p:817-829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110581 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.