IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/glenvp/v21y2021i3p49-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impacts and Public Opinion About International Trade: Experimental Evidence from Six OECD Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Quynh Nguyen
  • Robert A. Huber
  • Thomas Bernauer

Abstract

Do environmental implications of international trade influence public support for economic globalization? And under what conditions do environmental considerations shape individuals’ trade attitudes and policy preferences? In this study, we examine the microfoundations of the trade–environment nexus based on survey-embedded experiments in six OECD countries. Our empirical findings demonstrate that environmental implications have a substantial causal effect on public opinion about international trade. Furthermore, our results indicate that citizens are similarly sensitive to both domestic and international environmental implications of trade. These findings suggest that there is probably sufficient public support for green economy policies that take into account the global rather than only national environmental impacts from trade when designing trade policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Quynh Nguyen & Robert A. Huber & Thomas Bernauer, 2021. "Environmental Impacts and Public Opinion About International Trade: Experimental Evidence from Six OECD Countries," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(3), pages 49-76, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:21:y:2021:i:3:p:49-76
    DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00607
    Download Restriction: Access to PDF is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1162/glep_a_00607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:glenvp:v:21:y:2021:i:3:p:49-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.