IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/usppxx/v8y2021i1p9-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive

Author

Listed:
  • Katy Klauenberg
  • Cord A. Müller
  • Clemens Elster

Abstract

Millions of measuring instruments are verified each year before being placed on the markets worldwide. In the EU, such initial conformity assessments are regulated by the Measuring Instruments Directive (MID). The MID modules F and F1 on product verification allow for statistical acceptance sampling, whereby only random subsets of instruments need to be inspected. This article re-interprets the acceptance sampling conditions formulated by the MID. The new interpretation is contrasted with the one advanced in WELMEC guide 8.10, and three advantages have become apparent. First, an economic advantage of the new interpretation is a producers’ risk bounded from above, such that measuring instruments with sufficient quality are accepted with a guaranteed probability of no less than 95%. Second, a conceptual advantage is that the new MID interpretation fits into the well known, formal framework of statistical hypothesis testing. Thirdly, the new interpretation applies unambiguously to finite-sized lots, even very small ones. We conclude that the new interpretation is to be preferred and suggest re-formulating the statistical sampling conditions in the MID. Re-interpreting the MID conditions implies that currently available sampling plans are either not admissible or not optimal. We derive a new acceptance sampling scheme and recommend its application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Suggested Citation

  • Katy Klauenberg & Cord A. Müller & Clemens Elster, 2021. "Hypothesis-based Acceptance Sampling for Modules F and F1 of the European Measuring Instruments Directive," Statistics and Public Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 9-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:9-17
    DOI: 10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/2330443X.2021.1900762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:usppxx:v:8:y:2021:i:1:p:9-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uspp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.