IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v25y2023i1p42-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce

Author

Listed:
  • Noortje de Boer
  • Nadine Raaphorst

Abstract

A dominant assumption in the street-level bureaucracy literature is that bureaucrats’ discretion is curtailed by automated systems. Drawing on survey and factual data (n = 549) from Dutch inspectors, we test the effect of automation on enforcement style and whether this can be explained by discretion-as-perceived. Our results show that automation (1) increases bureaucrats’ legal and accommodation style; (2) discretion-as-perceived does not mediate this effect; but (3) automation does decrease discretion-as-perceived. The main implication is that we do not find empirical evidence for curtailment and future research should move beyond discretion to understand effects of digital systems on bureaucrats’ behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Noortje de Boer & Nadine Raaphorst, 2023. "Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 42-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:42-62
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:25:y:2023:i:1:p:42-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.