IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpsaxx/v39y2023i1-2p49-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fear of punishment as a driver of survey misreporting and item non-response in Russia and its neighbors

Author

Listed:
  • William M. Reisinger
  • Marina Zaloznaya
  • Byung-Deuk Woo

Abstract

Following its February 2022 invasion of Ukraine, the Russian government sharply broadened what actions were illegal and raised the level of punishment. Many more topics of interest to survey researchers became politically sensitive. Questions about these topics may generate high levels of misleading responses and question-specific (item) non-responses, both of which introduce biases that undermine inference. We use survey data from 2015 and 2018 in Russia and neighboring countries to illustrate how these two problems were already issues prior to the invasion, especially for questions that invoked potential punishment by the state. In a climate of heightened state punishment, it becomes even more important to address misresponse and item non-response when interpreting survey data. We argue that, in addition to employing list experiments regularly and taking advantage of recent innovations in their design, scholars must develop ways to reduce item non-response and model how it biases estimates of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • William M. Reisinger & Marina Zaloznaya & Byung-Deuk Woo, 2023. "Fear of punishment as a driver of survey misreporting and item non-response in Russia and its neighbors," Post-Soviet Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1-2), pages 49-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:39:y:2023:i:1-2:p:49-59
    DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2022.2150490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2150490
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2150490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpsaxx:v:39:y:2023:i:1-2:p:49-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpsa .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.