IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v13y2020i4p448-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tale of two cities - A comparative study of historical urban cores

Author

Listed:
  • Olha Tikhonova
  • José Beirão

Abstract

This research explores urban patterns in historic settlements inside fortification walls by comparing two European cities. Similarities in their historical development raised the question of whether they share urban morphotypes at the block level. To address this question, we conducted an urban matrix analysis using k-means clustering, applied to a database of morphological attributes from two different urban elements – buildings and urban blocks – with buildings considered as parts of blocks. Data revealed common patterns and unique features of each city and helped assess the degree of similarity among them. Results suggest that the two cities have different development outcomes. Six block types were identified, four of which were found in both cities but with a different distribution of prevailing building types. Moreover, two of them were found to be unique to each city. We offer potential explanations of the observed differences and discuss them.

Suggested Citation

  • Olha Tikhonova & José Beirão, 2020. "A tale of two cities - A comparative study of historical urban cores," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 448-465, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:448-465
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2020.1753227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2020.1753227
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2020.1753227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:13:y:2020:i:4:p:448-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.