IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v9y2024i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does top-down accountability promote responsiveness? Evidence from a survey experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Pei Zhong
  • Yu Zeng

Abstract

Does top-down accountability spur bureaucrats to improve service provision? This paper highlights the potential drawbacks of top-down accountability for building a responsive bureaucracy. Based on an online survey experiment involving 923 bureaucrats in China, we find that bureaucrats are less responsive to citizens’ needs when they are exposed to the risk of being sanctioned and the recent remedial policy of principled tolerance cannot offset such effects. In contrast to scholars arguing that increased top-down accountability pressure improves government responsiveness, these findings imply that insulating bureaucracy allows them to do their jobs more responsively. The findings enhance our understanding of accountability and responsiveness in China and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Pei Zhong & Yu Zeng, 2024. "Does top-down accountability promote responsiveness? Evidence from a survey experiment in China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:1-22
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2023.2300181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2023.2300181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2023.2300181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.