IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v36y2023i3p2155207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is pension insurance a barrier to entrepreneurship? New evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yian Chen
  • Li Guiping
  • Wenjing Gao

Abstract

This article provides evidence of the impact of pension insurance on entrepreneurship. It uses recent, nationally representative sample data from the Chinese General Social Survey (2013). We use a probit regression model to investigate whether the pension insurance converge rate affects the probability of a person becoming an entrepreneur. We find that the presence of both basic pension and business pension insurance reduce individual entrepreneurial probability. We also find that the two types of pension insurance do not appear to increase entrepreneurship among any particular subgroup, based on geo graphical regions, gender, education, social connection or marital status. Moreover, we argue that the basic pension and business pension insurance actually have a negative effect on the probability of small business entrepreneurship. Even, we have found there seems to be one important exception to this general pattern. For, most importantly, basic pension and business pension insurance have a positive effect on the probability of one particular kind of entrepreneurship: Innovation-driven entrepreneurship. Exploring possible mechanisms, we find that the important transmission channels through which pension insurance affects business creation is the lack of security and total family income.

Suggested Citation

  • Yian Chen & Li Guiping & Wenjing Gao, 2023. "Is pension insurance a barrier to entrepreneurship? New evidence from China," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 2155207-215, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:36:y:2023:i:3:p:2155207
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155207
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2155207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:36:y:2023:i:3:p:2155207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.