IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v6y2018i3p362-393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditor subgroup status and audit quality

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Cao
  • Nanwei Hu

Abstract

Auditors typically separate into different auditor subgroups within the offices of audit firms. The interaction between informal subgroups significantly affects the audit process and audit quality. In this paper, we examine the effect of auditor subgroup status on audit quality in the context of Chinese culture, and study the moderating effect of positive direct contact on the relationship between group status and audit quality. Based on 50 mergers of Chinese audit firms between 1990 and 2016, we identify 106 auditor subgroups in 53 offices located in China. With this data, we find that the clients’ earnings management of low-status auditor subgroups is significantly higher after mergers compared with that of high-status auditor subgroups. In addition, when there is positive direct contact between auditor subgroups within an office, the deterioration extent of clients’ earnings management of low-status auditor subgroups declines compared with that of high-status auditor subgroups. The results of our analyses indicate that: (1) low-status auditor subgroups have a higher motivation to maintain or improve their position within the office and to safeguard their interests, they are more likely to behave opportunistically, and their audit quality will be worse; and (2) positive direct contact can effectively improve intergroup relationships and mitigate the adverse effects of auditor subgroup status on audit quality. Our research on subgroup status and intergroup contact extends the existing research boundaries of audit quality, and also provides more direct and reliable empirical evidence for the interaction between subgroups within the same office.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Cao & Nanwei Hu, 2018. "Auditor subgroup status and audit quality," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 362-393, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:362-393
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2018.1567119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2018.1567119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2018.1567119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:362-393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.