IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v6y2018i3p321-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting information comparability, demand differences and cross-firm information transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Weichao
  • Yang Daoguang
  • Liu Siyi

Abstract

Studies of the economic consequences of accounting information comparability mainly focus on the level of the individual firm. There is little direct empirical evidence that investors use comparability for cross-firm investment. This paper empirically examines the impact of accounting information comparability on cross-firm information transfer from the perspective of investor information demand. We find that increases in comparability can facilitate the transfer of earnings information across firms, regardless of whether the investor uses the information to expect unknown or verify existing information. However, when the reliability of accounting information changes, the role of comparability is different. We also find that property rights and the information environment affect comparability’s influence. Finally, the use of comparable information by investors will reduce the market response to the firm’s earnings information. In summary, comparability plays an important role in investors’ acquisition and use of external information to assess a firm’s value. Our study provides a more comprehensive understanding of the economic consequences of accounting information comparability and has important implications for corporate information disclosure and government regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Weichao & Yang Daoguang & Liu Siyi, 2018. "Accounting information comparability, demand differences and cross-firm information transfer," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 321-361, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:321-361
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2018.1567113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2018.1567113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2018.1567113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:6:y:2018:i:3:p:321-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.