IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v5y2017i3p294-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can media coverage improve the information disclosure quality of government final accounts?

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Zhang
  • Yao Zheng

Abstract

Public disclosure of the government’s budget is a prerequisite for the improvement of fiscal transparency and governance in government. This paper examines media attention following the disclosure of budget information by central government departments, and empirically analyses the impact of media coverage on the information disclosure quality of government final accounts. It is found that: (1) media coverage effectively improves the information disclosure quality of government final accounts through an information intermediary function (in relation to neutral reports) and a reputation management function (in relation to positive and negative reports); (2) the information intermediary function of media is vulnerable to the replacement of department officials, i.e. replacement of an official will weaken the positive relationship between neutral reports and the information disclosure quality of departmental final accounts; (3) the reputation management function of media is vulnerable to the performance of departmental final accounts, i.e. poor performance in final accounts will weaken the positive relationship between emotional reports (negative reports or positive reports) and the information disclosure of departmental final accounts. This paper contributes to the literature of media governance in the public domain from the perspective of information disclosure quality, and also reveals the potential constraints on the information intermediary function and the reputation management function of media.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Zhang & Yao Zheng, 2017. "Can media coverage improve the information disclosure quality of government final accounts?," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 294-325, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:294-325
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2017.1375629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2017.1375629
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2017.1375629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:294-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.