IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v11y2023i3p465-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can independent directors identify the company’s risk of financial fraud: Evidence from predicting financial fraud based on machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Yunjing Liu
  • Bin Wu
  • Min Zhang

Abstract

Combining the company’s risk of financial fraud predicted by the machine learning method and unique Chinese data of board voting, this study investigates whether independent directors can identify the company’s risk of financial fraud. We find that independent directors are more likely to express dissenting opinions on board’s financial-related proposals when the company has a higher risk of financial fraud; this impact is more pronounced when independent directors have more financial backgrounds or higher reputations. Further study shows that companies with independent directors’ dissension have a lower risk of financial fraud in the future after controlling the risk of financial fraud in the current year. Our findings indicate that independent directors can identify the company’s risk of financial fraud and play as a supervisor, thereby reducing the probability of the company’s future financial fraud. Our findings provide direct empirical evidence for the effectiveness of the independent director system and enhance our understanding of independent directors’ actual voting behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunjing Liu & Bin Wu & Min Zhang, 2023. "Can independent directors identify the company’s risk of financial fraud: Evidence from predicting financial fraud based on machine learning," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 465-492, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:465-492
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2023.2239670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2023.2239670
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2023.2239670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:465-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.