IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v11y2023i2p247-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The environmental protection law and the zombie companies – evidence from a quasi-natural experimental method

Author

Listed:
  • Donghua Zhou
  • Yuxiu Huang

Abstract

This paper takes the public companies as a sample during 2012–2017, using DID analysis to test the relationship between 2015 new ‘Environmental Protection Law’ and zombie companies. The results show that the promulgation of the new environmental protection law has significantly negative with zombie enterprises. The strengthening of environmental regulation has accelerated of transformation and upgrading by assets restructuring and promoted technological innovation, which inhibiting the formation of zombie enterprises. Furthermore, this paper found that the negative relationship between environmental law and zombie companies mainly concentrate in non-state-owned enterprises, small-scale enterprises and enterprises with high regional environmental law enforcement intensity. Moreover, the promulgation of the new environmental law has a significant positive effect on corporate value in the medium and long term. This paper enriches the research literature in the field of zombie enterprises and economic consequences of environmental regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghua Zhou & Yuxiu Huang, 2023. "The environmental protection law and the zombie companies – evidence from a quasi-natural experimental method," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 247-269, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:247-269
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2023.2249041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2023.2249041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2023.2249041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:247-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.