IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v10y2022i1p49-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credit availability and classification shifting: based on the quasi-natural experiment of the bank lending interest rate ceiling deregulation

Author

Listed:
  • Jingru Wang
  • Hongjian Wang
  • Xinghe Liu
  • Qingyuan Li

Abstract

Based on the exogenous shock of the bank lending interest rate ceiling deregulation in China, this paper uses a difference-in-differences model and studies how credit availability affects classification shifting from the perspective of formal debt contract formation. We find that high-risk firms’ classification shifting degree is higher after the bank lending interest rate ceiling deregulation. Cross-sectional heterogeneity tests show that the impact of the deregulation on classification shifting is stronger when the level of financing constraints is higher, the diversity of financing channels is lower, the bank’s need for information is higher, and the bank’s monitoring is higher. Mechanism tests further show that the deregulation enables high-risk firms to increase borrowing through classification shifting. We use the unique setting of China interest rate liberalisation to scientifically identify the debt financing motivation for classification shifting. This study expands and enriches the institutional determinants of accounting information production.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingru Wang & Hongjian Wang & Xinghe Liu & Qingyuan Li, 2022. "Credit availability and classification shifting: based on the quasi-natural experiment of the bank lending interest rate ceiling deregulation," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 49-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:49-72
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2022.2082722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2022.2082722
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2022.2082722?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:49-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.