IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oaefxx/v7y2019i1p1682743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative sectoral price elasticities of U.S. energy demand

Author

Listed:
  • Kwame Asiam Addey
  • Saleem Shaik
  • Kekoura Sakouvogui

Abstract

A sustainable energy system is key for addressing the world’s environmental and social challenges. The U.S is the second largest consumer of energy, with increased energy consumption in the previous half-century. To curb energy demand, it is essential to understand the relative price elasticities among the four main U.S energy consumption sectors; residential, industrial, commercial and transportation. The aim of this study is to present a theory-based comparative analysis of U.S sectoral energy price elasticities using the pooled mean group model. The speed of adjustment for the four sectors were −0.43, −0.41, −0.55 and −0.37, suggesting the existence of long-run relationships. The short-run own-price elasticities were −0.17, −0.39 and −0.27 for the commercial, industrial and residential sectors while the long-run own-price elasticities were −0.33, −0.45 and −0.20 for the commercial, residential and transportation sectors. We conclude that the residential sector readjusts to long-run equilibrium at a faster rate than the three other sectors. In the long run, this sector will yield a higher response to a price change. We suggest that price policies aimed at reducing energy demand should primarily target the residential sector, followed by the commercial and transportation sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwame Asiam Addey & Saleem Shaik & Kekoura Sakouvogui, 2019. "Comparative sectoral price elasticities of U.S. energy demand," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1682743-168, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:1682743
    DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2019.1682743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2019.1682743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23322039.2019.1682743?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:1682743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/OAEF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.