IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jtrust/v13y2023i1p87-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The look in your eyes: The role of pupil dilation in disguising the perception of trustworthiness

Author

Listed:
  • Matia Okubo
  • Kenta Ishikawa
  • Takato Oyama
  • Yoshihiko Tanaka

Abstract

Pupil size reflects the cognitive and affective states of the beholder and thus shapes interpersonal impressions. Individuals with dilated pupils are evaluated more positively than those with constricted pupils. The present study investigated the role of pupil dilation in building interpersonal trust. We used face photographs taken by Okubo et al. (2017), in which models (N = 81) were posed as trustworthy persons for a photograph shown in an economic game. We measured the pupil diameter of each model’s photographs using image processing software. The pupils were dilated when the models expressed trustworthiness in their faces. Moreover, untrustworthy choices in an economic game predicted pupil dilation. As dilated pupils produce positive impressions, the results suggest that pupil dilation may be associated with concealing signals of trustworthiness. Untrustworthy individuals may use pupillary responses almost incapable of voluntary control to exploit others in social interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Matia Okubo & Kenta Ishikawa & Takato Oyama & Yoshihiko Tanaka, 2023. "The look in your eyes: The role of pupil dilation in disguising the perception of trustworthiness," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 87-97, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:87-97
    DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2023.2165090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21515581.2023.2165090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21515581.2023.2165090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jtrust:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:87-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJTR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.